Author Topic: Open Forum on Political Discussions and Moderation  (Read 1710 times)

tbrannon

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1961
Re: Open Forum on Political Discussions and Moderation
« Reply #45 on: May 09, 2010, 07:54:52 AM »
Mark,
 
I hope the 8  and 6 strings are serving you well.  Even if you decide to never post content here again, I'd love to see some more pictures or get an update on how they're treating you.  An update to your showcase thread or an email to the address in my profile would be much appreciated.
 
Take care,
Toby
 
(Message edited by tbrannon on May 09, 2010)

mike1762

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1048
Re: Open Forum on Political Discussions and Moderation
« Reply #46 on: May 09, 2010, 09:27:37 AM »
Did I spell that wrong??? LOL

pas

  • club
  • Advanced Member
  • *
  • Posts: 353
Re: Open Forum on Political Discussions and Moderation
« Reply #47 on: May 09, 2010, 09:30:53 AM »
Regular comedian, eh?

eligilam

  • club
  • Advanced Member
  • *
  • Posts: 432
Re: Open Forum on Political Discussions and Moderation
« Reply #48 on: May 09, 2010, 12:17:37 PM »
 
 
 
 
(Message edited by eligilam on May 09, 2010)

oddmetersam

  • club
  • Advanced Member
  • *
  • Posts: 384
Re: Open Forum on Political Discussions and Moderation
« Reply #49 on: May 09, 2010, 02:32:19 PM »
I find this discussion about discussions as riveting as some of the discussions we've been discussing...Seriously, though, last year when I traveled to Scotland I went with a co-worker who is as polar opposite in his socio-political views from mine as you could possibly imagine.  But we knew we'd have a great time because our mutual obsession with single malt scotch would make everything else momentarily irrelevant.
 
For two weeks we set aside our differences and had the time of our lives.  As I'm drinking in the pictures and articles in this forum I have the same feeling.  It's not that I don't care what folks here think about all the  divisive hot-button issues that seem to have the whole world going crazy; but this forum is a reminder (for me, at least) of what makes all of us more alike than different.  
 
But if I was really, really upset with something that was posted, I'd probably be more inclined to respond privately, if possible.  BTW, this is still my favorite forum out of all the ones I frequent.  Thanks for that!
-Sam
legionkondor@hotmail.com

edwin

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3433
Re: Open Forum on Political Discussions and Moderation
« Reply #50 on: May 09, 2010, 03:03:20 PM »
Masterofmanystrings, I am curious why you feel the need to lay down such a detailed screed to a place which you state is in your rear view mirror. If you are not here, why should we incorporate the standards you seek? It's one thing to have a moderator who's active in the experience of the participants (which is a thankless job at times, no matter how objective and fair you try to be. I have been a moderator from the most contentious times at The Bottom Line, so I know what that's like), but to try to live up to the standards of someone who doesn't even want to be a part of the community just seems silly. Blasting out the last word and then telling everyone that you won't even discuss it isn't really all that helpful. If you feel that you really have the perfect formula for running a board like this, I would love to be a member. However, I do hope you decide to stick around here in the long run.
 
 In fact, the whole thing seems a little blown out of proportion in that we're creating more heat around the idea of conflict instead just dealing with the small amount of conflict that we sometimes have. All in all, this is one of the best behaved boards I've seen (go check out the political sections at Gearslutz or Talkbass, if you want to see how that might play out here).
 
At the end of the day, this place does belong to the Wickersham's and it's awfully nice that we get to discuss what the protocol might be but it's not a democracy. The best path seems to me is for us to all behave like adults and try to keep our inflammatory political statements to ourselves (we all have them, I can be one of the worst). Sometimes they do get posted, but if we see something inflammatory, let it go. So someone takes a gratuitous swipe at Fox News. Everyone knows it's a gratuitous swipe, no matter which side of the issue you are on, so it doesn't need to be pointed out in the thread, just move on. If no one responds to gratuitous swipes, the threads stay cooler and the swiper will probably quit swiping, either out of realization that it might not have been the best thing to say, or, if they are a troll, which I don't think was the case here, they will quit trolling because all a troll seeks is reaction. If you really have to say something, take it offlist. I've done that and it always works out fine. I'm with Slawie, I'd like no changes. This board is a big house with many rooms, if you don't like the conversation in one, go to another and chances are the conversation you don't like will peter out or maybe morph to something more interesting. It's like music, some of us might not tolerate metal while others might find jazz pretentious, but it all can be played on an Alembic. If a post really bothers you, call security and move on.

masterofmanystrings

  • club
  • Junior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 18
Re: Open Forum on Political Discussions and Moderation
« Reply #51 on: May 09, 2010, 03:41:23 PM »
... I find the first 2 of 3 posts before Toby's 2 back-to-back posts to (apparently) be a perfect illustration of the ridiculous uptightness here... and, at the same time, how current policy discourages many people who are NOT so uptight from being here.
 
Thanks for the gratuitous swipe at Faux News. You've just concisely demonstrated why politics have no place here.
 
As I read this it's hard for me to really integrate and grasp the notion that this is a serious comment... that someone actually did (and/or actually COULD)... be offended by this.  I'm still not actually sure.  I'm actually not sure if pas is serious or joking... though I'm interpreting the former to be the case.
 
If so, this is *in my opinion, from my perspective* ridiculous beyond measure.  But whatever.
 
What I find possibly even more remarkable is Toby's quote It is my opinion that Alembic will be  by sponsoring such a subsection of the forum.
 
Wow.  What a remarkable statement.  So... allowing a section (... and JUST one section)where people can speak frankly and freely on matters of any/all importance might hurting their corporate image.  Wow.  How?
 
I assert that assertion is preposterous.  I further assert that NOT allowing AT LEAST one section in which people can speak freely without censorship speaks much more, and much more negatively.
 
Whatever.  You can do whatever you want.  You -as individuals, and collectively- can reason, or you can rationalize... or you can attempt to do both.  Those are your options, and your only options.
 
You can support the one paradigm -in which case you're logically obligated to support its preconditions and requirements- or the other paradigm... or you can try and combine them and see what results you get.
 
In fact, it's all been done before and the results are consistent and predictible.
 
You can choose to do whatever you want.  You have the right to do so.  This is not in question.
 
But, for your own benefit and sake, KNOW what you do... and be honest about it.
 
Be honest about what you're debating/discussing/considering.
 
There are PLENTY of people who DO have the skills to engage in civil and ration discussion about the many extremely important things in the world OTHER THAN the commonality of Alembic instruments that likely initially drew most of us here.  This is plain fact that can not be rationally denied.
 
It is also plain fact that A LOT of people -who DO/HAVE/MIGHT/WOULD/WOULD STILL come here... do so at least partially for this UNIVERSE of richness... for the fact that we can, in our communications, discuss... well, in theory, anything and everything.  Why not?
 
For me, the notion of censoring anything anywhere is preposterous, and moreover, just plain alien.  Why?  You see, I don't have anything to fear.  There isn't anything anyone can say that can have power over me... I learned an old rhyme about sticks and stones quite some time ago, and it's true.
 
But okay, I get that some people haven't developed or aren't willing to exercise the skills that myself and others DO have.  Experience has taught me frankly that most if not such individuals are in actuality choosing to be self-limiting... but, if so, or not... that is their choice.
 
However, they shouldn't be limiting me.
 
AND THAT'S WHAT THIS IS ALL ABOUT.  Yeah.
 
To be blunt, from my perspective, anyone who confesses that they are unable or unwilling to deal with open, honest, and offensive communication is confessing a profoundly disturbing and problematic condition that I can not regard in any way other than like a physical and/or mental disease, or addiction, or serious negative condition.
 
In such cases, I sympathize with such individuals, and hope they will choose to make the best choices to change their conditions, and I will tend to help them to the extent they're willing.
 
But I will never accept and will always resent the notion of them putting chains or limitations on me and others because of the negative choices they make.
 
If you're not up for open communication... don't engage in it.  If you don't like reading something... don't.  If you don't like listening to something... don't.
 
Censorship is about the worst in/of us... about the lowest common denominator... calling the shots and restricting the best in us.
 
This is a profound and important truth that can either be recognized or evaded.  The consequences can also be recognized or evaded.  In either case, they exist, and, though subtle, are far-reaching.
 
Censorship doesn't, and can't protect us from anything; but it can and does divide us, and subject us to different and inconsistent treatment.  That's a fact, and you only need consider it to see that it is so.
 
I would go so far as to argue that free speech and survival go hand and hand, and advocating censorship is advocating that which is contrary to our survival and well-being.
 
I hold that any and all arguments -and I've heard 'em all- that we need to be protected from offensive/free speech are preposterous.  And be clear, you can NOT separate free speech from offensive speech... nor can either of these be separated from meaning or important speech...
 
It's quite a thing to advocate restrictions on speech and communications; you can't do so without opening many cans of worms and causing many consequences.
 
In my opinion, only the profoundly clueless and deluded fail to grasp that these consequences and problems are not only MUCH MORE SERIOUS than the alleged problems censorship/restrictions on open communcation supposedly prevent... BUT are in fact far greater concerns than anything that COULD result from open communication.
 
Let us ask, consider, and answer the question, what's the worst that can happen if free/uncensored speech occurs?  Well the answer, gang, is those individuals that are so self-limited by choice that they feel they must leave any sites where they see things that offend them... will leave.
 
In fact, this is a given that nothing can change.  Including attempting to cater to them.
 
Again, you can do what you want.  But again, you should be honest about it, and aware of the consequences.
 
If you want to allow the lowest common demoninator... or let's just say those that are unable or unwilling to acquire/exercise the adult skills that myself and plenty of others have to engage in open, free, uncensored, and offensive communication... and all the incredible rewards and benefits and horrors (I personally don't see any at all, even one) -to keep those who ARE capable of doing do from doing so... be honest about it, and realize that there are a lot of people who aren't going to come here.
 
Ultimately, censorship, and an environment in which free and open (and therefore offensive) communication is forbidden... is ultimately more harmful and offensive than any supposed evil or concern it might address.
 
See, as part of a larger issue, what really needs to happen is that those who have the ability to reason and integrate, and rationally and civilly discuss and argue... let's say ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING OF IMPORTANCE... should be able to do so freely and without interference from those who can't or won't... and should be able to help those people get better (to whatever extent they're willing, and for those for which that is not at all, that is, of course, their (sad) choice.
 
What should NOT happen in the world, in any way shape or form, in any arena, is for those who can and do have the ability to engage in such discourse to have their ability to do so undermined by those who choose a more limited path.
 
If you don't want to think, fine, but don't keep me from doing so.
 
If you're not up for reasoning, fine, but don't try to keep me from doing so.
 
If you're not up to reading things you disagree with and responding in a rational, civilized, reasoned, and adult-like manner, and communicating in an open fashion, and with all that entails and implies... don't.  Your loss.
 
But if you support restricting others abilities to do so, you're... something bad, shameful, and something which is responsible for the harm and evil in the world.
 
No kidding.
 
The choice is up to you.  But you can't escape the consequences.  So be honest about it.  Take the blinders off and try and look at the infinitely bigger picture than the tiny sliver you -those of you that advocate an other-than-uncensored environment- are seeing.
 
For my parting comment, I'll add I don't expect my words to register much here.  From what I can tell, most who do or would agree with me have already left, and those who've stuck around are a self-selected bunch that does consider such an environment acceptable.
 
From my perspective, frankly, the place seems to be a lost cause... as far as a place I'd feel welcome and inclined to participate in.  And I'm not the only one.  And I've taken the time to explain in great, explicit, and clear detail, and in very reasonable terms -why this is so.
 
Later, folks.  I don't expect to be back to post again, after this, but I'll leave the door open.  I'll check in in a couple days or weeks and see if I see any indication what I've said actually registered with and meant anything to anyone, or whether it was a waste of time.  My expectation that the latter will be the case (along with the expectation/possiblity that my post(s) would just plain be censored) is why I've not made this effort before.

cozmik_cowboy

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7339
Re: Open Forum on Political Discussions and Moderation
« Reply #52 on: May 09, 2010, 03:54:22 PM »
I would not like to see the proposed feel free to tear each other's throat out section; I don't believe that it would take long for any acrimony generated therein to make itself felt in the rest of the forum, thus 1) ruining the whole thing and 2) casting a bad light on our gracious hosts & their business.  
On the other hand, as I consider the two ugliest words in the English language to be mandatory and forbidden, neither am I in favor of stricter guidelines as to political & religious references.  The current guidelines ask that we refrain.  For the most part we do, and that really does seem to work well most of the time; as others have pointed out, this about the most civil forum going.    
Now, if you want to propose hard-and-fast rules on all-cap posting, repeatedly responding to your own posts when no one else is, making your instrument the subject of every thread, belligerent reaction to any and all disagreement, or general incoherence, that's a different matter .  
 
Peter
"Is not Hypnocracy no other than the aspiration to discover the meaning of Hypnocracy?  Have you heard the one about the yellow dog yet?"
St. Dilbert

"If I could explain it in prose, i wouldn't have had to write the song."
Robt. Hunter

eligilam

  • club
  • Advanced Member
  • *
  • Posts: 432
Re: Open Forum on Political Discussions and Moderation
« Reply #53 on: May 09, 2010, 04:27:10 PM »
I want to see a cage match between the_eight_string_king and hendrixclarke!
 
Oh, and our physicians' lounge also shows lots of Fox News...but it's mostly because Martha MacCallum is on during the lunch hour.

ajdover

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1046
Re: Open Forum on Political Discussions and Moderation
« Reply #54 on: May 09, 2010, 04:47:41 PM »
I remember back in the day when there were no TVs in Dr's office - only horrible Muzak.  Or worse (again, back in the day) disco.  But I've got to say - Fox News has some hotties! ;-)  Now back to your regularly scheduled discussion ....
 
Alan

bsee

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2658
Re: Open Forum on Political Discussions and Moderation
« Reply #55 on: May 09, 2010, 05:11:09 PM »
I get the feeling that this thread would be better located in the miscellaneous forum. It's only been three and a half days, but it seems  like most of what needs saying on this topic has been covered. I think we've come to the part of the program where Susan and Mica consider what has been said, their feelings, and the needs of Alembic. We can keep talking about it, but I don't expect we'll hear any new arguments.
 
-bob

edwin

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3433
Re: Open Forum on Political Discussions and Moderation
« Reply #56 on: May 09, 2010, 05:38:42 PM »
My doctor's office has none of the above. Just some magazines. My dentist's office, on the other hand, is very groovy. It's got wonderful large format art books to peruse (and great paintings by my dentist's wife) and a raw food kitchen. While you wait, they bring you exquisite concoctions, sometimes desserts, to enjoy. They also offer massage and other techniques to make it a stress free visit. I've never looked forward to going to the dentist before (although the dentist is a little bit like Dr. House, although mostly with his staff and never with the patients.).

David Houck

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15599
Re: Open Forum on Political Discussions and Moderation
« Reply #57 on: May 09, 2010, 05:44:13 PM »
Wow; what a great dentist office!  If it wasn't so hard to get to from here.

mike1762

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1048
Re: Open Forum on Political Discussions and Moderation
« Reply #58 on: May 09, 2010, 05:59:39 PM »
I just Googled Martha MacCallum... I'll have to start paying more attention to Fox!!!

hb3

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 759
Re: Open Forum on Political Discussions and Moderation
« Reply #59 on: May 09, 2010, 09:11:25 PM »
I want to see a cage match between the_eight_string_king and hendrixclarke!  
 
Yesssssss!!!!!