Alembic Club

Connecting => Swap Shop and Wish Lists => Seen on craigslist, eBay, and elsewhere => Topic started by: edwardofhuncote on August 08, 2026, 07:49:02 AM

Title: '87 Stanley Clarke
Post by: edwardofhuncote on August 08, 2026, 07:49:02 AM
This one's at a retail store in Dallas I don't know anything else about.

https://reverb.com/item/77185091

Seems like I remember these earlier Stanley Signature models were rosewood, but the wood choice in this particular one looks remarkably like a walnut Series bass I had. Just a coincidence I guess.

Note also, the 3-pin XLR jack. Interesting.
Title: Re: '87 Stanley Clarke
Post by: Nova Constellatio on August 08, 2026, 07:58:25 AM
The neck laminates on that one seem wonky.
Title: Re: '87 Stanley Clarke
Post by: garyhead on August 08, 2026, 08:56:34 AM
Yeah....there needs to be more information on that 3-pin connector.  I also do not see a separate battery compartment.
Title: Re: '87 Stanley Clarke
Post by: edwardofhuncote on August 08, 2026, 09:03:47 AM
Quote from: garyhead on August 08, 2026, 08:56:34 AMYeah....there needs to be more information on that 3-pin connector.  I also do not see a separate battery compartment.
There wouldn't be in a Stanley Clarke Sig... the battery goes in the control cavity. Purely a guess; I have a buddy on Talkbass who modified a Persuader Vector years ago to be powered externally with an XLR. Might be what they've done here. Or it's simply a record-out jack. Don't know.

*I sent the shop a message asking. Curiosity killed a cat. Hoping it just knocks me over the head.

Somebody played the daylights outta' that thing, but it looks well cared-for. Not abused.
Title: Re: '87 Stanley Clarke
Post by: garyhead on August 08, 2026, 09:09:21 AM
Quote from: edwardofhuncote on August 08, 2026, 09:03:47 AM
Quote from: garyhead on August 08, 2026, 08:56:34 AMYeah....there needs to be more information on that 3-pin connector.  I also do not see a separate battery compartment.
There wouldn't be in a Stanley Clarke Sig... the battery goes in the control cavity. Purely a guess; I have a buddy on Talkbass who modified a Persuader Vector years ago to be powered externally with an XLR. Might be what they've done here. Or it's simply a record-out jack. Don't know.

Somebody played the daylights outta' that thing, but it looks well cared-for. Not abused.
Thanks for the clarification.  I've been so focused on Series basses lately that I forgot about the signature units.
Title: Re: '87 Stanley Clarke
Post by: tkotmk42 on August 08, 2026, 03:40:08 PM
Quote from: Nova Constellatio on August 08, 2026, 07:58:25 AMThe neck laminates on that one seem wonky.
oh my, i noticed it right away.... that will haunt me if I was the owner of this bass......

Takeo
Title: Re: '87 Stanley Clarke
Post by: edwardofhuncote on August 11, 2026, 11:59:29 AM
I never got a reply about the XLR jack. I guess they figured I'm just a tire-kicker and I ain't even that. 

I see what you guys mean about the neck laminates, or at least I think I do. The maple segment of the beam on the G side is noticeably thicker than the E side. That's strange. Not even sure how or why that would be. It really wouldn't affect anything though... everything else is centered up. The string spacing is odd, but I think it's set that way on purpose. 
Title: Re: '87 Stanley Clarke
Post by: adriaan on August 11, 2026, 02:21:51 PM
Looks like the A and D strings are too close together, I wonder if those two saddles were swapped at some point. That might be awkward to play.
Title: Re: '87 Stanley Clarke
Post by: Barend on August 11, 2026, 04:16:10 PM
Quote from: adriaan on August 11, 2026, 02:21:51 PMLooks like the A and D strings are too close together, I wonder if those two saddles were swapped at some point. That might be awkward to play.

Yes that's really weird. I see no reason why anyone would want it like that.
Title: Re: '87 Stanley Clarke
Post by: DistillaMatto on August 12, 2026, 04:59:18 PM
Quote from: Nova Constellatio on August 08, 2026, 07:58:25 AMThe neck laminates on that one seem wonky.
Do you mean the inlays? If so, mine are faded as well. There's a thread about that somewhere here.
Title: Re: '87 Stanley Clarke
Post by: honkylips on August 12, 2026, 05:15:44 PM
Quote from: DistillaMatto on August 12, 2026, 04:59:18 PM
Quote from: Nova Constellatio on August 08, 2026, 07:58:25 AMThe neck laminates on that one seem wonky.
Do you mean the inlays? If so, mine are faded as well. There's a thread about that somewhere here.
I'm pretty sure they are referring to the maple laminate on the treble side being significantly different in width than the bass side.  I admit it took me some time to find "Waldo" even knowing there was something wonky to look for. 
Title: Re: '87 Stanley Clarke
Post by: DistillaMatto on August 14, 2026, 07:59:02 AM
Quote from: honkylips on August 12, 2026, 05:15:44 PM
Quote from: DistillaMatto on August 12, 2026, 04:59:18 PM
Quote from: Nova Constellatio on August 08, 2026, 07:58:25 AMThe neck laminates on that one seem wonky.
Do you mean the inlays? If so, mine are faded as well. There's a thread about that somewhere here.
I'm pretty sure they are referring to the maple laminate on the treble side being significantly different in width than the bass side.  I admit it took me some time to find "Waldo" even knowing there was something wonky to look for.
Right. Now I see it. That is strange. I wonder if it is an optical illusion?
Title: Re: '87 Stanley Clarke
Post by: Nova Constellatio on August 14, 2026, 08:13:23 AM
It isn't — it shows up in multiple photos.