I have to disagree as to what dealer you buy from. I am glad that I took the time to research dealers. The money I saved from one dealer to the next was not $10 - $50 bucks but closer to $1000.00. I am not going to talk about any one dealer or another but doing your homework in life nearly always pays dividends in the end. I don't see the point of lining someone elses pockets when I can use the cash just as much as they can if not more. I am not knocking your loyality to Uncle Bob, I just think we are talking to much money to not get the best price posible on one of these fine instruments!
I just HAVE to say that this is clearly a reasonable opinion, and one which is clearly respectfully presented -just as I'd also say the opinion/position/preference to deal exclusively with one dealer without educating one's self on alternatives/shopping around, based on positive emotional feelings as an opinion that is reasonable and certainly one's perogative to have.
So... what the heck is the issue here? It seems to me like you're laying into the guy, and HEAVILY, and I'm completely bewildered. If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it probably is a duck. Well, it looks to me like you're laying into Rory because he doesn't share YOUR viewpoint. Is this so? Or am I missing something? Your viewpoints ARE clearly different and incompatible, but it would seem to be a subjective preference. My viewpoint -as a brief digression- is somewhat of an integration of both your views as I value/exhibit loyalty -which has been discovered/achieved/developed by shopping around -and it is my opinion that doing so is a good thing which benefits EVERYONE (except those who make profits by over-charging to those who don't know any better) -by requiring dealers to retain customers by a combination of excellent prices and excellent customer service. In fact, this is the ONLY way dealers can retain the educated customers who DO shop around.
Anyway, my two cents is that you seem to be major ragging on this fellow Rory without making any clear case why he is wrong/bad/whatever. I think if you're going to publicly call someone out, you should back it up (by all means, if you're right, and he's done something wrong). On the other hand, if you're flipping/tripping for some reason, maybe a brain lapse or something (I've had it happen to me more than once) than perhaps an apology is in order.
He can comment on my dealer, but then order and have to sell brand new Alembics for a loss since he has a problem giving in to his personal lust for a Series. That is just too funny. The one reason I don't go to Alembic to visit is because I know I won't walk out without ordering a Series. It's that simple.
To use the words of poker champion Mike Matusow,
Vindication, baby!
When ordering an Alembic, money isn't the issue, is it Rory? It's about getting the instrument you want. And I see you have a problem with that for whatever reason.
This will keep me laughing for sometime. Thanks for the story.
What on earth is the point of this? It really seems bizzare.
As this is a public forum, where viewpoints are expressed and responded to -with an expectation, of course, of civility- I respectfully ask for clarification, Tom. Has Rory done something wrong that he should be condmemned for? If so, what? Please spell it out, and make a case. If you're right, I'll publicly agree for whatever it's worth. But if you're gonna call a guy out the way you apparently are, you should make a clear and strong case. As far as I can tell, you're having a bizzare hissy-fit simply cause Rory doesn't see things the way you do. If it's not so please set me (and others who may also be wondering) straight.
Maybe I'm getting this all wrong, but I looked at it several times before writing this, and the duck thing, yadda yadda...
So... what's up? Mark, the 8 String King.