The sound and feel of the short-scale Series basses are really something special. The Stanley Clarke association aside, I believe those factors are behind the constant demand for that configuration.
I have a graphite-neck short-scale Series 2 from '82 that I should bring for you to check out if I ever play NYC again. That bass has its' own little following. Best instrument I've ever touched.
Yours, as far as features in common with other basses, has a lot in common with Bucky's bass, 74-52, and a later Series One, 75-150, which I almost bought a few years ago but which ended up with another member here due to a mold problem I had and the very sudden move that followed it.
Both of those basses have walnut necks with what looks like maple stringers (accents) and the lovely caramel-colored pickups. You'll notice that 74-52 shares the scalloped nut, but has a brass plate between the pickups. That's not the humcanceller, as occupies that position on your bass; rather, the humcanceller is hidden inside the body and underneath that compartment are the batteries. I gather that is an earlier design that was abandoned shortly after 74-52 was built.
On the other hand, 75-150 has an un-scalloped nut and a humcanceller in the center position. I wasn't there, but my guess is that 75-150 was built during the early part of that year. Going on the assumption that Alembic's production probably wasn't more than a few dozen instruments per year at that point, I'd venture a guess that yours is a '74, not a '75.
Very curious to see what Mica can tell us. I'm warming the oil for the popcorn right now.
