Author Topic: Progress  (Read 2441 times)

Chris R. Gedney (76ac070)

  • Guest
Progress
« on: June 09, 2002, 12:28:29 PM »
Hi Mica!
 
Just a thought...any possibility of posting some in progress shots of all of the work being done to 76AC070?  You're welcome to decline if you think that the deconstructed, unfinished photos would be too traumatic.
 
Cheers!
 
Chris

mica

  • alembic
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10595
Progress
« Reply #1 on: June 10, 2002, 11:05:07 AM »
I thought you didn't want to see it happening. But from your post I'll guess you've changed your mind. Here's a shot of the stripping in progress:
 

 
The bass is in spray now, so it will be a while before any other interesting photos are available.  

Chris R. Gedney (76ac070)

  • Guest
Progress
« Reply #2 on: June 10, 2002, 12:37:53 PM »
WOW!!  Stop, no more, PLEASE!?  Just kidding....tell me, is it a wet sanding process. Is it done by hand or machine?  I can't wait to see what the finished product by The Masters looks like!  Thanks for the update...keep 'em coming at your leisure!
 
Chris

mica

  • alembic
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10595
Progress
« Reply #3 on: June 10, 2002, 01:10:53 PM »
Stripping is completely done by hand. It takes a good 8 hours of elbow grease. The little wet looking spot is the original finish, the rest of the bass has already has all the old paint removed and is covered in dust.

mica

  • alembic
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10595
Progress
« Reply #4 on: June 14, 2002, 06:11:58 PM »
First round of finish and the recessed humx plate.
 


Chris R. Gedney (76ac070)

  • Guest
Progress
« Reply #5 on: June 15, 2002, 04:12:04 AM »
WOW!  What a difference between the 1976 finish (still visible in the PU/HMX cavities?) and the 2002 finish.  The contrast between the schedua/cherry and the purple heart/walnut is spectacular.  I can't wait to see everything unwrapped with the Tree of Life inlay showing!!  Thanks for the pix - keep 'em coming!!
 
Chris

Steve Smith (alembickoa)

  • Guest
Progress
« Reply #6 on: June 15, 2002, 05:40:26 AM »
Amazing!!! Makes me want to send up the '81 flame koa for a refin.

Chris R. Gedney (76ac070)

  • Guest
Progress
« Reply #7 on: June 15, 2002, 06:59:54 AM »
Mica - one more question (for now) - I am unable to get close enough to the photo to discern - is the HMX ring the one that was on the bass when I sent her to you - or is it/are you making a new one to your specs?  The one that was on there was not particularly well tooled and may look out of place when everything else is completed to Alembic's high standards.  Naturally, the decision is yours to make!

Chris R. Gedney (76ac070)

  • Guest
Progress
« Reply #8 on: June 15, 2002, 05:39:51 PM »
Mica - NOW my brain is getting in gear!  How about this?  (correct me if any of my assumptions are incorrect)  Being that the position of the HMX is critical relative only to the PUPs and not the strings (since it serves no microphonic purpose) - could we recess the HMX enough to accomodate a brass plate which, since the routing is already complete, would completely cover the HMX and end up being approximately the same width as the PUPs?  It could either be pressure fit or recessed screw fastened.  This would certainly look much more seamless and custom and MUCH LESS like an afterthought and a cover for the mistake that we both know that I made years ago.  Of course, my only concern is whether there is some magnetic interference - only you and Ron can determine that as I never bothered to dissect the circuitry! ;)  I like the idea but the decision will be yours.
 
Cheers!
 
Chris

mica

  • alembic
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10595
Progress
« Reply #9 on: June 17, 2002, 03:15:26 PM »
That is the new recessed humx ring fit on the bass now. My dad was actually already a little worried about the brass ring interfering with the hum cancelling, but got that worked out. I think we should steer clear of the completely concealed humx and just let it do its job. We could make a thin wooden plate that would not affect the humcancelling. I actually think the little brass ring looks cool - it really looks like a vintage Alembic that way to me.
 
It's neat you can still see the old finish in the bottom of the cavities, glad you noticed.  
 
Steve, refinishing from us ain't cheap at $750, but we do completely strip the old paint off, sand out and scratches or dings in the wood and refinish with clear or tinted paint. It also includes a fret mill and cleaning the brass parts. It makes the bass look and play like new. Here's the tough part for you: we need it for at least 6-8 weeks. Maybe with your Spoiler you could part with your first love for a couple of months, but that might be a wee traumatic for you.
 

Chris R. Gedney (76ac070)

  • Guest
Progress
« Reply #10 on: June 17, 2002, 03:39:02 PM »
Mica - as previously stated the choice is (collectively) yours.  You all know far more than I do about the functions of the various components.  Thanks for the answers and, as you have indicated, stick with the ring!
 
Chris

Steve Smith (alembickoa)

  • Guest
Progress
« Reply #11 on: June 17, 2002, 07:11:34 PM »
Mica...750 is completely reasonable. I am torn, aside from being a bit broke at the moment...;^)...part of me would love to see a new finish, but I think a larger part of me wants her to grow old gracefully. When you open up the case, you see an Alembic that has done a helluva lot of gigs, much like Doc's dad's Series. There is just a certain vibe that 21 year old chunk of koa has that I really don't want to mess with. She would be real pretty, though, with a makeover. I must say she is growing old with much more grace than I!!!

Chris R. Gedney (76ac070)

  • Guest
Progress
« Reply #12 on: June 21, 2002, 07:55:16 AM »
Say, Mica -  
 
When you have a chance, if you wouldn't mind looking in the file and telling me the precise order date and birthdate of 76AC070?  I'm gettin' real old ;) and I'm attempting to reconstruct my own file on her for posterity.  Also, Susan at one time tried to explain how my instrument might have wound up with such an odd serial number - it leads to some serious confusion when attempting to explain the AC - have you any input on deciphering this apparent enigma?
 
Thanks!!
 
Chris

Chris R. Gedney (76ac070)

  • Guest
Progress
« Reply #13 on: June 26, 2002, 08:34:38 AM »
Any news on the cost for the refret and the binding?  Also, the previous post questions still burn within me for answers.  ;) (wink wink)  Thanks again for all of yours and James' attention to detail on this monumental task!
 
C YA
 
Chris

mica

  • alembic
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10595
Progress
« Reply #14 on: June 26, 2002, 11:37:03 AM »
The original $500 estimate for refretting with the binding is amended to $400. James pulled out the frets on Monday. Now he's replacing the previously replaced ivoroid inlays with the antique ivory recovered from a piano. It's been going a lot smoother than anticipated, so we actually got the reduce the price.  
 
The AC was a series of numbers used sporadically to designate a custom instrument. These are not on the main sequence of numbers, and this idea was completely abandoned by 1978. Most instruments with an AC serial number code will be elaborate like your bass.