Author Topic: Double Neck Dream  (Read 2352 times)

tbrannon

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1961
Re: Double Neck Dream
« Reply #45 on: April 24, 2008, 09:50:28 AM »
I really like those purpleheart lams the way you have them.
 
The DW body style isn't my personal favorite, but this is certainly cool.

senmen

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1354
Re: Double Neck Dream
« Reply #46 on: April 24, 2008, 10:47:15 AM »
Rob,
fantastic!!!
Could you put on the bridges and knobs like on my DW TFJ?
Maybe an additional selector switch for the both necks?
What about the necks? 4string fretless on top and 8string below?
Maybe the 8string with a longer DW headstock to fit the 8tuners.
Maybe 4 big and 4 small?
 
You are great man...
Oliver (Spyderman)

rami

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 883
Re: Double Neck Dream
« Reply #47 on: April 24, 2008, 12:13:27 PM »
Wow Rob,
 
Perhaps you can work part time for Alembic.  That looks exquisite... and very, very expensive!
 
The Doubleneck actually makes sense with that body style. That upper portion of the wing would help with the balance. I'd go with a fretted 4 lower neck and a fretless 4 upper neck. I'd also try to get the necks still more parallel.
 
It should be player friendly as well as being a beautiful work of art.
 
My 2 cents,
 

rob_the_fiend

  • club
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 83
Re: Double Neck Dream
« Reply #48 on: April 24, 2008, 01:10:41 PM »
Oliver. Work in progress... patience.
 
How about using the standard(DW) headstock on the upper neck, and a mirrored on the lower.
That would put the bass tuners on the outside, then the smaller (shorter) guitar tuners end up on the inside.
Skip the bevel on the side of the lower peghead.
 
No difference in size for the -heads.
 
Can someone give me a blueprint for the knobs and dials?

senmen

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1354
Re: Double Neck Dream
« Reply #49 on: April 24, 2008, 01:17:51 PM »
Rob,
sorry, didn?t want to push you. I am really happy about your skills With the headstock will not work as we need e/E a/A d/D g/G so I think we must mix between small and big ones.
 
Oliver (Spyderman)

senmen

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1354
Re: Double Neck Dream
« Reply #50 on: May 09, 2008, 03:42:29 AM »
Rob,
thank you so much.
Have just sent a mail to Mica and Susan rgdg a definite estimate.
So I hope we can turn this beast into reality (and you will have fun with this too)
Cheers
Oliver (Spyderman)

rob_the_fiend

  • club
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 83
Re: Double Neck Dream
« Reply #51 on: May 09, 2008, 04:19:19 AM »
Ovals in place.
 

senmen

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1354
Re: Double Neck Dream
« Reply #52 on: May 09, 2008, 04:28:18 AM »
Rob,
you are quick as hell. A real CAD master.
BTW I have decided only to take three stringers for the neck throughs as on my DW Tears for John.
Cheers
Oliver (Spyderman)

rob_the_fiend

  • club
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 83
Re: Double Neck Dream
« Reply #53 on: May 09, 2008, 04:42:42 AM »
Considering that You are getting this as a double of the bass You already have, I understand that.
 
Do You mind if I keep the fading out PH lams on the renderings?
I think the three simple ones look ... boring.

rob_the_fiend

  • club
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 83
Re: Double Neck Dream
« Reply #54 on: May 09, 2008, 04:50:00 AM »
Mica. What are the diameters of the drills used to make the pockets for the string ends in the tailpiece?
Do you use the same size when it's a octave tailpiece?
 
And what is the stringspacing between bass and octave string. Thanks.

senmen

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1354
Re: Double Neck Dream
« Reply #55 on: May 09, 2008, 05:30:32 AM »
Rob, of course. No problem. I once had a Spyder 8string, here are some pics to give you an idea on string spacing. On this one, the pair of strings used a tailpiece together. So I don?t know, what Mica would do on the DDW? Double slots or using one slot for two strings?!  

 

 

 

  Oliver (Spyderman)  (Message edited by davehouck on August 10, 2008)

rami

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 883
Re: Double Neck Dream
« Reply #56 on: May 09, 2008, 06:51:15 AM »
Hey Oliver,
 
I personally don't like the look of two strings sharing the same slot.  It takes away from the detail of the Bass.  That's the only thing I don't like about the 12 string Baritone Guitar.
I would also bookmatch the tops and backs to center - I'd rather cover the neck.
 

rob_the_fiend

  • club
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 83
Re: Double Neck Dream
« Reply #57 on: May 09, 2008, 06:56:02 AM »
This tailpiece uses individual holes, image in Mica's post #5272.
 
http://club.alembic.com/Images/631/14858.html?1179778327

senmen

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1354
Re: Double Neck Dream
« Reply #58 on: May 10, 2008, 02:15:52 AM »
Rami,
I think they did it on the Spyder as there are only 4 single tailpieces. Generally, of course, it looks better.
The top on TFJ is also bookmatched, of course, but I personally like the look of the neck through, this is classic Alembic.
Oliver (Spyderman)

rami

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 883
Re: Double Neck Dream
« Reply #59 on: May 10, 2008, 06:14:19 AM »
I agree with you Oliver. For what a custom instrument costs, it is 100% about personal preference.
That Spyder 8 string is just beautiful beyond words. A very unique instrument.  
 
Rami