Author Topic: Dreams to Reality..Time to build the Custom  (Read 670 times)

marco555

  • Guest
Dreams to Reality..Time to build the Custom
« on: September 24, 2010, 12:22:10 PM »
OK Forum...Time to hear from the group..sold the Status, still have the 77 series 1, going to begin by building with anniv. electronics but leave room for S1/S2 electronics .CORE first..Mahogany? Vermillion? Solid? Chambered? I'm thinking of a modified Rogue body (no neck choice Yet)I want warmth, but solid low end bite. What's the diff? Any other suggestions?

David Houck

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15592
Dreams to Reality..Time to build the Custom
« Reply #1 on: September 24, 2010, 06:29:53 PM »
There is a good discussion of body woods here.

masterofmanystrings

  • club
  • Junior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 18
Dreams to Reality..Time to build the Custom
« Reply #2 on: September 24, 2010, 07:26:44 PM »
Whatever you do, make sure you get at least one Ebony neck laminate.  It's the single biggest thing you can do to awesome-fy your tone.
 
If you're planning on getting Anniversary electronics and later upgrading to Series, make certain you specify that you want your bass to include the prep for future Series upgrade option.
 
I recommend getting continuous wood plates as an option -they look great and take off weight.  However, if you do get these and/or get LEDs, you need to think about coordinating the plan with the Series prep.
 
The Series prep includes Alembic drilling out (in advance) the cavities you'll need for your eventual upgrade to Series, and applying the silver shielding paint, and adding the dummy pickup and the 5pin jack.
 
It's recommended that you make it clear that you want to be able to upgrade to Series in the future as this requires a slightly thicker body to accommodate the electronics.
 
If you opt for a Rogue body, you'll also likely need the Pregnant Rogue body variant -again to accommodate the future Series electronic... so again it would be important to make this clean before and/or when you order.
 
I give a hearty recommendation to the Balance K body shape.
 
But make sure you get an Ebony neck laminate; even one will do the trick.  If you haven't heard about it, ask around, and everyone who has one will back me up on this.
 
One last thing: if you get LEDs, you might be able to have them and your power run through the 5pin jack, in which case you could avoid a battery cavity for LEDs and save a little money by not having that and not needing a continuous wood plate for the cavity (assuming you get that option).  But this would mean you couldn't use them when playing wireless (if you do or want to be able to).
 
Just a few things to consider as you order your custom.
 
Oh, Coco Bolo looks and sounds great, too!
 
What scale length are you getting?  Shorter is better unless you're getting a B string, in which case you shouldn't go shorter than a 33 or 32 inch scale.

briant

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 700
Dreams to Reality..Time to build the Custom
« Reply #3 on: September 25, 2010, 02:13:07 PM »
But make sure you get an Ebony neck laminate; even one will do the trick. If you haven't heard about it, ask around, and everyone who has one will back me up on this.
 
That totally depends on the sound you're going for.  I like the ebony lam in my Rogue 5 but didn't get one when I ordered my custom Essence (still under construction).  The ebony really dominates the tone.  If that's what you're going for that's great.  If not you may find yourself owning a very expensive mistake.
 
What scale length are you getting? Shorter is better...
 
That's totally up to the player.  I don't care for short scale basses.  35 is my preference.  Again different strokes for different folks.  I do agree that 34+ is best for a low B string.  I've found that some manufacturers have great low B strings at 34 scale while others sound bad for ease of discussion.
 
When I ordered my first custom I read the entire  section of this site.  Then started searching on various things I had questions about.  You can educate yourself and get a really good idea about what you want.  Then ask more direct questions based on what you personally believe you want in a custom.

marco555

  • Guest
Dreams to Reality..Time to build the Custom
« Reply #4 on: September 27, 2010, 06:31:33 AM »
I have begun phase 1....the quotation phase! We have the following: 1)34 scale 4 string 2)my anniv. elec.3)P bass size neck w/ebony lam.set neck 4)Walnut core 4)Modified rogue body for series elec.
I'm going with a set neck for a more percussive sound. The ebony lam will make the fundamental pop. Susan feels the Walnut core should do a better job on accentuating the mids better. I still have not decided on keeping or selling the 77 S1. Has anyone ever tried making the string spacing wider by changing the bridge width?

David Houck

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15592
Dreams to Reality..Time to build the Custom
« Reply #5 on: September 27, 2010, 07:07:21 AM »
Has anyone ever tried making the string spacing wider by changing the bridge width?
 
I would imagine there is not much if any additional space between the G string and the end of the frets.  My guess is that if you were to widen the string spacing at the bridge, you would have problems with the E and G strings being too close to the end of the frets.

David Houck

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15592
Dreams to Reality..Time to build the Custom
« Reply #6 on: September 27, 2010, 07:10:32 AM »
I like the specs you've posted; should make for a very cool bass.

marco555

  • Guest
Dreams to Reality..Time to build the Custom
« Reply #7 on: September 27, 2010, 07:20:42 AM »
Dave,
thanks for the help. i have not yet received the quote, but I think it will be an eye opening experience. I tried to work the quote generator, but mine would be without electronics. Perhaps you wouldn't mind sending me some info off line to my other e mail to help me guide my way?

oddmetersam

  • club
  • Advanced Member
  • *
  • Posts: 384
Dreams to Reality..Time to build the Custom
« Reply #8 on: September 27, 2010, 12:35:00 PM »
Just a tiny note. I wasn't totally sure about string spacing, since I never measured mine on my Spector, so I had the luxury of taking her up to the Mothership and Mica measured everything for me and constructed my Sig Dlx neck accordingly.
 
The only thing I had to adjust to -- and hadn't even thought of -- was that the angle of the fret bevels is different than what I was previously accustomed to and I found I was fretting out much more readily on the G string when I bent the string down towards the floor. I don't think I've ever seen a reference to that phenomenon in the forum, before, so maybe it's just me (and my lousy technique!). Of course, a year later I've made the subconscious adjustment but it kinda freaked me out at first....
 
Anyway, good luck on your bass. So far it sounds like it's gonna be killer!
 
-Sam

marco555

  • Guest
Dreams to Reality..Time to build the Custom
« Reply #9 on: September 27, 2010, 01:30:37 PM »
I'm hearing many varied opinions on set neck vs. neck through. Is there more attack to be derived from the wood used, or the way it's assembled? If I went with an ebony neck lam in a set neck or neck through, which is the stronger determining factor? Perhaps it's in the hands of the player.

David Houck

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15592
Dreams to Reality..Time to build the Custom
« Reply #10 on: September 27, 2010, 02:48:34 PM »
I think the basic idea is that in a neck-through the string vibration is, to a large extent, isolated in the neck, since both the fret where the note is fingered and the bridge, i.e. both ends of the plucked string, are attached to the neck.  Thus in a neck-through the woods that primarily affect the tone are the neck woods.  The body woods still play a role, depending to a large extent what kind of woods they are, but the neck woods primarily shape the tone.
 
In a set neck, one end of the plucked string is set in the neck while the other end is set in the body.  Thus the body woods play a much more important role.  In a set neck, since the vibration isn't isolated to and being fed back through the neck, there is a loss of sustain.  And in a set neck the frequency range isn't as even since there is a bump caused by the break between the neck and the body.  This gives set neck instruments a more pronounced mid to low-mid tone.
 
Neither is necessarily better than the other since it depends on what the player wants.
 
Personally, I prefer a neck-through for the more balanced frequency response and better sustain.
 
For your ebony neck lam, it will have a much stronger effect in a neck-through than in a set neck.

David Houck

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15592
Dreams to Reality..Time to build the Custom
« Reply #11 on: September 27, 2010, 03:03:25 PM »
Marc, check out this thread; it does a much better job of discussing the differences between neck through and set neck than I did.  Plus, Mica has a post in there too.

crobbins

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 987
Dreams to Reality..Time to build the Custom
« Reply #12 on: September 27, 2010, 04:38:48 PM »
What about a neckthrough with the top lam bookmatched to center? Would that affect the tone more than not being bookmatched to center?

David Houck

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15592
Dreams to Reality..Time to build the Custom
« Reply #13 on: September 27, 2010, 05:35:34 PM »
My guess is that it would be a small difference; and again, it would depend on the wood.  Some top woods are pretty much just for visual appeal, while others clearly affect the tone.

crobbins

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 987
Dreams to Reality..Time to build the Custom
« Reply #14 on: September 27, 2010, 05:55:46 PM »
Yeah, I was thinking a really tight flame maple, or CocoBolo......