Author Topic: (?) WO394 (was????????????????,,)  (Read 474 times)

bigyouth

  • club
  • Advanced Member
  • *
  • Posts: 258

keith_h

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3490
(?) WO394 (was????????????????,,)
« Reply #1 on: February 14, 2007, 04:24:22 AM »
The serial number is usually stamped into the wood on top of the peghead for older Series 1.  
 
Keith

dela217

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1313
(?) WO394 (was????????????????,,)
« Reply #2 on: February 14, 2007, 05:33:04 AM »
That looks like a 1980 or 81.  I am guessing the serial number is under 1900.
 
Nice bass!  The extra lam in the neck gives it a series 2 look.

lbpesq

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10683
(?) WO394 (was????????????????,,)
« Reply #3 on: February 14, 2007, 07:05:01 AM »
The non-adjustable nut also points to an early one, though, from the picture, it looks like it may not be the original nut.  If the Serial number isn't found at the top of the headstock, the next place to look is on the wood at the 24th fret.  
 
Bill, tgo

bigyouth

  • club
  • Advanced Member
  • *
  • Posts: 258
(?) WO394 (was????????????????,,)
« Reply #4 on: February 14, 2007, 07:10:19 AM »
c'est peut-etre une serie 2?
it is perhaps a series 2?

lbpesq

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10683
(?) WO394 (was????????????????,,)
« Reply #5 on: February 14, 2007, 07:24:46 AM »
Definitely a Series I.  The Series II doesn't have the toggle swithes fo the Q controls, like this bass does.
 
Bill, tgo

bigyouth

  • club
  • Advanced Member
  • *
  • Posts: 258
(?) WO394 (was????????????????,,)
« Reply #6 on: February 14, 2007, 07:49:11 AM »
where is the serial numbers?
head stock ,no
24th fret ,no
please,help me!!

cozmik_cowboy

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7338
(?) WO394 (was????????????????,,)
« Reply #7 on: February 14, 2007, 08:12:53 AM »
Try in the control cavity.
 
Peter
"Is not Hypnocracy no other than the aspiration to discover the meaning of Hypnocracy?  Have you heard the one about the yellow dog yet?"
St. Dilbert

"If I could explain it in prose, i wouldn't have had to write the song."
Robt. Hunter

adriaan

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4318
(?) WO394 (was????????????????,,)
« Reply #8 on: February 14, 2007, 08:34:42 AM »
Looks like a bone nut, or perhaps plastic? And we have a new member of the lefthanded clan - a warm welcome from the righthanded clan!
 
L'outil de traduction que tu utilises est vraiment trop b?te. Il faut chercher un autre - mais comme tu peux voir, on parle un tout petit peu de fran?ais ici.

southpaw

  • club
  • Advanced Member
  • *
  • Posts: 301
(?) WO394 (was????????????????,,)
« Reply #9 on: February 14, 2007, 09:19:53 AM »
Another lefty, Alright!  That means there are more lefty Alembics in the world. Nice looking bass Bigyouth, welcome aboard. Did you look at the top of the headstock, from above for the serial number?

mica

  • alembic
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10595
(?) WO394 (was????????????????,,)
« Reply #10 on: February 14, 2007, 09:34:52 AM »
The appearance of the bass is that of a Series I with Series II neck lamiantion pattern. You are correct that the top and back woods are Zebrawood (nice flatsawn at that). Have you had this bass a long time?
 
To try and research the serial number, look for a handwritten number in these locations:
 
1. under one of the pickups
2. one or more of the potentiometers
3. on the preamp circuit card (the side not visible in the photo)
 
Do you have the powersupply? Maybe add a photo of it as well as its serial number. It might help.  
 
Other things I noticed from the photo:
 
1. The pickup connector on the replaced pickup looks awkward.  
 
2. It appears that the neck pickup may be plugged into the humcanceller pickup position on the preamp card. If this is true, I expect lots of noise. Confirm humcanceller (center) pickup is plugged into the center connector. Then perform a humcancelling procedure to eliminate the low frequency noise.  
 
3. One of the nuts on the intonation screws looks replaced. The bridge intonation looks strange.  
 
4. The string nut looks like it was replaced.
 
5. If the Gotoh tuners are original, it indicates this bass is not older than the mid-eighties. If this is the case, the serial number would have been originally stamped in the Ebony of the fingerboard directly below the 24th fret.  
 
6. The wiring harness looks older than the mid-eighties.  
 
7. Something is funky about the extra cut at the center of the tailpiece. I've only seen things like that in the scrap pile.  
 
8. The logo looks genuine (and highly polished), but it's really off axis and smashed in on the left side.  
 
These things night mean:
 
1. The bass was refretted at some point, and the serial number was sanded away.
 
2. The bass was made here by someone out of scrap parts and never had a serial number.
 
3. The bass was a Fernandes (though I've never seen a lefty) and later refitted with Alembic parts of various ages.  
 
If you can find some of these other numbers, especially one under the pickups, it can help solve the mystery.

dela217

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1313
(?) WO394 (was????????????????,,)
« Reply #11 on: February 14, 2007, 07:34:11 PM »
What strikes me as strange is the tuners.  If this bass is an 80's model, it would have been equipped with Schallers.  The Schallers have a mounting screw in a different position.  I do not see holes where the old tuners were replaced!
 
I don't think this bass started it's life as a Fernandes.  The zebra that they used was never this nice.  Besides the inside of the control cavity on a Fernandes is black, and there are no copper grounding strips.  It seems that someone would have gone through a LOT of trouble ($$$) to try to turn a copy bass into an Alembic if that were the case.  
 
It just seems like some of the details are mixed from different years.  PF6b electronics with Mod Pots, the holes for the tuners, etc...
 
Pretty bass though!

mica

  • alembic
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10595
(?) WO394 (was????????????????,,)
« Reply #12 on: February 14, 2007, 08:03:53 PM »
Mid eighties is when Gotohs started showing up - Schallers were really low inventory everywhere then, and shortly after than we converted wholly to Gotoh. I started working here in 1987 and it's a clear memory the crisis that no Schallers available anywhere caused.  
 
Confirmed with dad that the pots are not left-hand rotation, which would be AB mod pots even now.  
 
I agree that the Fernandes route is unlikely, plus I've never seen a lefty one.  
 
I hope that Mehdi can maybe find some of the other numbers to try and track down at least a year, and maybe get to cross reference the work order number.

bigyouth

  • club
  • Advanced Member
  • *
  • Posts: 258
(?) WO394 (was????????????????,,)
« Reply #13 on: February 15, 2007, 12:34:52 AM »
number preamp card:
alembic  pf6b
170 035
number write with the hand `6`2`

adriaan

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4318
(?) WO394 (was????????????????,,)
« Reply #14 on: February 15, 2007, 01:42:33 AM »
The strange split in the tailpiece suggests someone tried to turn it into a 5 string? Then perhaps the peghead has had new veneers to cover up the extra hole for the 5th tuner?
 
I seem to remember seeing a Distillate that had that sort of conversion done.