I have an SC Deluxe bass with cocobolo top and continuous back, mahogany body and some maple looking laminates to make the sandwich body and purpleheart neck laminates.
I have never played another one since yesterday.
I went into a music store and they showed me an alembic SC Standard model which they were selling second hand.
I had a play of it. It had,i think, rosewood top laminage and a mahogany body with metal backplate and two pinstripes in the neck.
This is the first opportunity I have had to check out another alembic similar to mine.
Observation No:1 the standard bass was much lighter than my bass seemed about 30% difference or more in weight.
No:2 the tone of the bass though very good, was nowhere near as meaty, crisp, full or as defined as my own bass.
Now based on the fact that the electronics are the same, the difference in sound can only be due to the woods I have on my bass in comparisson.
I was really impresssed/surprised the difference the basses have and I guess the biggest difference is probably due to the the body woods and coco bolo being the largest part of that.
I've heard many things said about the various woods on alembics doing this and that to the tone and fundamentals, sustain etc etc blah blah blah. and to be honest I didn't really pay that much attention as it sort of sounded a bit nerdy.
Now I take those thoughts back and can appreciate the audible difference between woods used and why buyers are so particular about what woods to use.
I never doubted the wood selection made a difference to the sound of an alembic thats pretty obvious, but I didn't realise it was THAT much different and clearly audible.
Jazzyvee