Author Topic: Question for Dave Houk and experts, anyone can join though!  (Read 488 times)

lg71

  • Advanced Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 331
Question for Dave Houk and experts, anyone can join though!
« Reply #15 on: October 01, 2006, 08:29:36 AM »
Ok. sorry, I got mixed up with Studio 54! LOL
 
57basstra, Dave said he can only get you one made of Basswood

David Houck

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15599
Question for Dave Houk and experts, anyone can join though!
« Reply #16 on: October 01, 2006, 03:46:47 PM »
Thanks Mica!
 
Sorry guys, I'm a bit behind.
 
That Essence was my first Alembic.  I bought it used.  A previous owner installed the middle pickup.  It was not a professional installation; someone routed a pickup cavity and screwed it in there, then they unplugged the neck pickup and plugged in the new middle pickup.  That was it.
 
This was my main bass for a long time.  Although I liked the combination of the middle and bridge pickups, I unplugged the middle pickup and plugged the neck pickup back in.  After thinking about it for a long time, I finally picked up a Spoiler as a replacement and sent my Essence to Santa Rosa.
 
Alembic reinstalled the middle pickup properly.  And in addition to a three way Q switch, they installed a pickup selector switch.  I also got a satin feel neck, aluminum side position markers, and brass sustain block and had the frets crowned.
 
While waiting for the Essence, I picked up the S1 that Jim mentioned above and that became my main bass.  Thus I haven't used the Essence much plugged in.  It has been my main practice bass (unplugged) just because it is so much fun to play; I love the neck.  But I dont' plug it in to my main rig, because it would require a substantial re-Eq of everything; my rig is setup for my S1.  I do really like the addition of the Q switch, and I find that on this bass I seem to prefer the switch in the off position, although on my S1 the bridge Q is always on high.
 
Because it's all Maple, this bass was a bit aggressive to begin with.  Adding the sustain block makes it more so.  What (comparatively)little I've experimented with it suggests that the pickup combinations and Q choices are all variations on the aggression theme.  So far it appears that my favorite pickup combo is middle and bridge.  And I've noticed that I'm making more use of the Pan control than I used to.  But again, I haven't EQ'd my rig to match the bass.  If I were running this bass through my F-1X and SF-2, I could probably tone down the aggressiveness, warm up the low end and smooth out the high end and make much better uses of the all the available tone combinations.
 
So, the changes made a wonderful bass much more flexible.  But with the S1 getting all the work, the Essence isn't getting the attention that it deserves.

lg71

  • Advanced Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 331
Question for Dave Houk and experts, anyone can join though!
« Reply #17 on: October 03, 2006, 02:13:46 PM »
Hello Dave,
 
Thanks so much for the long post and precise answers, much appreciated.
 
I see that you like the middle  and bridge pickup, so do I, I mean on my Arias, the one with the single middle pickups are my favorite, and I never use the neck pickups on its own on the other one.
 
I have a great idea, I have never seen it before. I'd be nice to have RAIL system below the pickup(s), so you could position your pickup(s) exactly where you want... from virtually touching the neck to touching the bridge, I guess it could be easy to do, but it would require a very wide routing from the neck to the bridge, and it wouldn't look that great, but I am sure there could be ways of making it look nice.
 
I think that if I had a Series 1, I'd probably would play the non series like you said. So, I understand what your saying. I too, would like one and only one bass that would give me a huge range of sound and control, with the right neck, frets and body shape...

adriaan

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4320
Question for Dave Houk and experts, anyone can join though!
« Reply #18 on: October 03, 2006, 02:42:41 PM »
You're not the first to think of movable pickups - and you're not in bad company either. Alembic #1 had them, with rails and all.
 
They probably didn't provide quite as many useful variations as you would think beforehand, otherwise I'm sure you could still order them today.

lg71

  • Advanced Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 331
Question for Dave Houk and experts, anyone can join though!
« Reply #19 on: October 03, 2006, 02:51:03 PM »
Interesting, any links with pictures?

adriaan

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4320

lg71

  • Advanced Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 331
Question for Dave Houk and experts, anyone can join though!
« Reply #21 on: October 03, 2006, 03:51:48 PM »
Thanks Adriaan,
 
Oh! That bass looks like a spaceship man! Amazing...
 
I see the nice vintage processors in the back as well, priceless.

olieoliver

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2747
Question for Dave Houk and experts, anyone can join though!
« Reply #22 on: October 03, 2006, 03:58:11 PM »
I see cosmetics were not of great concern back then. It's weird you can see Alembic all over this bass then again...it's the same only different.

lbpesq

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10683
Question for Dave Houk and experts, anyone can join though!
« Reply #23 on: October 03, 2006, 06:37:28 PM »
I believe Bob Weir had an Ibanez prototype with movable pickups on plastic rails at one time.
 
Bill, tgo

olieoliver

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2747
Question for Dave Houk and experts, anyone can join though!
« Reply #24 on: October 03, 2006, 06:56:04 PM »
We had a Gibson at my high school, (lab band) with a single sliding pickup. I didn't like it at all.