Looks like I'm coming in at the tail end of this topic again...I blame it on the time difference (maybe I'm just slow)! Let's put it this way Angelboy, I'll be amazed if you aren't happy with the Alembic, although be aware it's quite a departure from the Stingray.In my experience I'd say the Stingray is probably more aggressive-sounding, but it lacks the incredible musicality of a through neck Alembic, and has nothing like the tone shaping capability. Of course the feel is completely different, so I guess it ultimately depends on your personal preference. You may find the Stingray better for some things, the Alembic better for others.You may also be interested to know Mark King used both on albums in his Alembic period,but preferred to use the Alembics live. Good luck anyway!
In passing, I've owned 2 Jaydees; one was like Roger's in that it was an extremely dead instrument. However someone had shaved the neck to a size that seemed to make it really unstable. The other was awesome; I actually compared it to an '80 Series 1 when I bought it, and there was nothing in it. Unfortunately I had to get rid as it weighed about 13 pounds and my back didn't like it!
Kayo, I'm surprised that you found the neck dimensions of Rickenbackers and Alembics to feel so different; one of the reasons I always got on with Alembics is that I learnt on a Rickenbacker (and have owned many since) and the necks always felt very similar to me; certainly in terms of the nut/bridge spacing differential (i.e. fairly straight and even and the exact opposite of a Fender Jazz, which is one of the main reasons I never got on with Jazzes). Wierd how different players perceive things so differently; but then variety is the spice of life!I'd be interested to hear Roger's take on this too.
All the best
Shaun