Author Topic: best way to get the phil lesh rubber bandy tone  (Read 2427 times)

edwin

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3433
Re: best way to get the phil lesh rubber bandy tone
« Reply #15 on: June 07, 2018, 09:47:47 PM »
Edwin, are you saying Brent had a more limited vocabulary than Keith?  If so, I need to sit down and do a heavy listen with that in mind to see if i agree; I never found Brent limited - but than, I never thought about it in those terms, either.

Peter

To my ear he played a lot of the same stuff over and over, and he also played and played and played. Part of being a versatile player is to know when to play less. Keith left plenty of space to let the music be what it was going to be. Brent played a lot of throw away notes.

IMHO.

rv_bass

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4383
Re: best way to get the phil lesh rubber bandy tone
« Reply #16 on: June 17, 2018, 04:51:35 AM »
Edwin clarified my thought on thinness; the bombs were there, but a thin high end sound persisted as he went through many different basses during that time.  And the changing Sound system too, especially when they started getting into the digital system. 

In terms of interaction, the changing keyboards can almost define the different sound eras of the band.  There is a distinct break in the sound and direction of the band with each change in keyboard player. 

I agree that Keith contributed quite a bit to the rubber band sound.  In my mind he was often a catalyst for starting and maintaining the long free jams. 

Nothing against Mickey, but I think adding back the second drummer limited their ability to turn the corner and build some of the freer, spicier, exploratory jams.  But then, the band became more refined and bounded in their approach over time as well.

And for a planet that is 4.5 billion years old, a few decades isn’t that ancient!  :)


« Last Edit: June 17, 2018, 12:23:47 PM by rv_bass »

edwin

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3433
Re: best way to get the phil lesh rubber bandy tone
« Reply #17 on: June 18, 2018, 05:44:26 PM »
"And for a planet that is 4.5 billion years old, a few decades isn’t that ancient!  :)"


Yes!