Hi, guys
These are some really great and really cools insights into how your music innervates your day to day work and how your day to day work innervates your music. I often play music loudly when alone, either when I was surrounded by chemicals and a fumehood/workbench, or now a range, countertops, and cats, but in both cases it was a sense of a dense and numinous atmosphere as it was ritual that facilitated the tasks at hand. I've also always wondered how a cherry'd out Griswold Erie, USA cast iron might make for a resonator or a banjo body if properly reclaimed, fabricated, and seasoned.
I would, in this mien, fail the total concentration part while working, as I'd listen to things that caught my attention in my ears or my head, and then I'd start thinking about them to the extent that I could/can while working on something else. While singular focus is gone, and thank goodness I am not a surgeon, but the work and the music would, for me, have that complementarity or symmetry between what I was doing, a universal time pressure, and the act of using my hands. For example, much of chemistry and many other such fused intellectual/technical endeavors involves several manipulations, and then a bunch of "hurry up and wait", like many jobs. If I had to do something really technical, read: gloved, wearing sealed intro to high-school chemistry goggles that mist more than they are transparent, and wear a "fire retardent" lab coat, and possibly even chem/acid loaded respirator because fume hoods die off all the time and you might handle something REAL nasty, I would do the work which required the "Spaceman KISS outfit" I had on, and then during "wait", I would invariably start looking at the reaction and zone out while thinking about the bass breakdown from Welcome to the Jungle, the intro to Sails of Charon, George Benson's jazz guitar, John McLaughlin, Jeff Beck, Vai, Van Halen, Randy Rhoads, George Lynch, Billy Sheehand, Jack Bruce, Lemmy, etc. as individuals, while still vaguely watching the thing in the fumehood and the timer, or I would start thinking about something musical but not super technical like the breadth of the the Winterland 1968 version of Sunshine of Your Love vs. Cream's numerous live and single studio versions and how that one Hendrix version, in my opinon, was better than most of Clapton's renditions, or even the same three day stint's renditions of Tax Free by Hansson and Karlsson, or Purple Haze where the signal path from Hendrix's huge hands to the tape was the best live album I think RYKO, or anyone has ever released, that I have heard (Jimi Hendrix Live at Winterland). I am not saying there are not better, but I can feel adrenaline in my arms signalling into my spine welling around track two or three all the way to the epilogue, so I might be a touch partial. Yadda, yadda, yadda, nothing blew up, caught fire, sometimes it worked, but I don't think this was pretending to be Jann Wenner in my skull that lead to failure; a 5% success rate in science means you're a star. \
But, someone once told me something that complements what I once read from Duff McKagan that is pure gold as far as advice:
<Post-doc> "Always listen to what the science is trying to tell you about itself so you can run the right experiment or make the right hypothesis to see what it is saying. And it may tell you through an accidental finding or serendipity"
<Duff McKagan> "Always serve the song."
These compliment each other in my mind as serving the song is not a static or even reproducible thing given the tons of variables seen in any real world endeavor. For instance, salvaging a bunk experiment, if you can, doesn't have a protocol on the back of a Duncan Hines box; salvaging bad music, or even bad ideas for the rudiments of something simple because you are over-invested in it is also a case of knowing what to do, when to do it, or even cut bait. Any sophisticated cognitive effort, as far as I have learnt, really has subsumed a LOT more training and made use of more experiences of varied quality and intensity to build any intuition and contribute to any intellectual gains that can bring this tasteful problem-solving set to bear on any task and resolve it elegantly, musical or otherwise. Or maybe it's all really easy, and I really suck at music, science, and cooking. There are those devotees of that opinion. Heretics.
Nonetheless, this isn't meant to sound effete, really, it was just an attempt to clear up what had appeared to be wonky and unclear before. Thus, there is no snoot, snark, or "harumph" intended, none, in what I am trying to say or how I am mangling it. But I really think there has always been some synergy in how we as musicians, professionals, and people, in real time, find a NECESSITY to use our experience, brain, intuition, a critical eye or ear, and so forth along with the cerebral component of playing music or doing something demanding as an airstarter for playing music or doing something demanding, as was mentioned by 5 A quilt top: that the doors swings both ways, and that you can reverse the particle flow through the gate. I agree that music can be in the spotlight or play a supporting role for other endeavors, and I have found this really useful myself. Thank you for the correction and introducing the converse to what my perceived argument was. Cheers.
I am going into this detail as I apparently may have been obtuse in my phrasing: it isn't the primacy of a job or music or an activity, per se, just that they are complimentary and by doing one thing, in general, it seems in my own life experience will start from one place and can end up shoring up or complimenting other endeavors. I wondered if other musicians who also had other professions, talents, and hobbies that were actively used felt a similar synergy. I don't intend to imply there is a right answer, I just wondered if there was similar experience on the forum where others may see a correlation between musical appreciation and acumen, and the refinement of existing abilities or the adoption of next modes of thinking.
It's really cool to see that there is, and how this relationship works for different people. Thanks again, and cheers.
-Zut