Author Topic: Warrior-Alembic comparison  (Read 274 times)

811952

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2507
Warrior-Alembic comparison
« Reply #15 on: September 23, 2004, 05:45:12 PM »
Rami and Kayo,
Yes, very well said.  The single most noticeable aspect of playing my Series I, versus any other bass, is the responsiveness of the electronics.  It is the only bass that actually gets louder in direct proportion to how hard I play it, while at the same time having such a long decay and even response that I can track the thing without using any compression or limiting.  To me, those are the properties that make it unique among basses.  And my favorite drummer always comments on how much sweeter it sounds than any other bass (and he's been around a lot of nice Warwicks of late).  Given the money, I wouldn't play anything but Alembic Series I or II, and I really don't understand why other people with excellent resources play Fenders and such.  But alas, I don't have the Pauls' access to stockings these days...
John

jeanbaudin

  • club
  • I'm New Here
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Warrior-Alembic comparison
« Reply #16 on: September 28, 2004, 01:05:35 PM »
I was the owner of the Warrior 9-string that Kent mentioned above (setup). No comparison to a nice Alembic!