I understand the collector mentality completely - you have to acknowledge the logic behind the argument that classical players have all those amazing 17th & 18th century fiddles because collectors kept them protected (Steve Stills justified being the first to pay $10,000 for a D-45 by explaining that he was bidding against a representative of a Japanese manufacturer who would have taken it apart to see what made it so good, and he wasn't going to let that happen); also, when I was young I couldn't wait until I could afford to be a collector, but with prices like $1500 for a '61 SG Les Paul and $150 for a '59 ES330TD (& $125 for a '61 Strat, for that matter), I knew I'd have to wait a while. Well, I saw a '61 Paul for $100,000 not long ago. The guy who owned the '66 Tele I learned my first chords on bought it for $300 in '78 & sold it for $600 in the mid-80s. I saw one on e-bay a month or so ago with a BIN of $16,700. I guess I won't be collecting any time soon - I'm glad the quality of new instruments is as good as it is, because the vintage stuff has gotten freaking insane - this is what they should go for in another 100-200 years.
And Bill - if you want to double your money on the Strat, shoot me an e-mail anytime !
Peter
Oh, yeah - there's a thread here, isn't there? SO, just to make it legit: I agree with Kevin - signatures on instruments look like graffiti.
(Message edited by Cozmik_Cowboy on April 12, 2007)
(Message edited by Cozmik_Cowboy on April 12, 2007)