Well,
This seems to be my day for controversy. I guess I?ve let statements to the effect that a pristine Skylark is not worth more than $1200.00 go by with no response one too many times. So, with that in mind, here I go:
I feel that anyone who thinks that the Skylark?s value should in any way be less than (or even in the same ball park as) Gibson?s or PRS has not spent enough time with a Skylark in their hands.
I?ve said this before, however, here goes again: I own a Gibson Les Paul (an old one, built when they gave a damn), a 1990 PRS, a Heritage H-575 custom, a Travis Bean Artist, Martins, Yari?s, Guilds, and Taylors. Hand built guitars all. And yet, none of these instruments are even in the same league as my Alembic Skylark. The idea that this instrument is worth less than any of these is quite frankly, laughable. And, if I could get the tears out of my eyes from the laughter, it?d be more than a little insulting.
Hey, I?m all for saving a buck whenever possible, but please. If somebody is fortunate to come across the right set of circumstances, by all means, recognize your good fortune, and buy it! However, value is a subjective commodity at best. I just find it interesting that there seems to be so much talk about what the lowest price is. Value is in the eye of the beholder. Not everyone is out for the almighty buck at the sake of all else. Personally, I don?t think anyone could buy my Skylark for any price. I love this instrument.
I hope I haven?t stepped too hard on anyone?s toes, however mine are feeling a little less pained. It?s just my opinion however unpopular that may be.