Author Topic: What's the better bass if Alembic was not around?  (Read 1629 times)

jet_powers

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 540
Re: What's the better bass if Alembic was not around?
« Reply #15 on: August 31, 2007, 10:38:35 AM »
Now I know why I can't find any good Ricks out there. Fish has them all!!! As far as second best, I really haven't a clue. I remember someone trying to sell me on Pedulla years ago and holding my ground, tempting though the offer was, and saying No thanks, I'll save a little longer for the Alembic.
 
I'm fairly certain I made the right decision.
 
JP

malthumb

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 537
  • One day I'll be half as good as my basses
Re: What's the better bass if Alembic was not around?
« Reply #16 on: August 31, 2007, 12:26:10 PM »
Sadowsky, MTD USA, or Roscoe
1987 Series I
2000 Mark King Deluxe / Series II 5-string

howierd

  • club
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 106
Re: What's the better bass if Alembic was not around?
« Reply #17 on: August 31, 2007, 05:26:06 PM »
I have only played my 77 series I for the past 29 years. I use it everywhere I play. I rehearse at home every day and at band rehearsal Tue. and Thur. eve, and gig at least two or three times a month. I want a 5 string but it will have be a series I. I couldn't play anything else.
Howierd

bsee

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2658
Re: What's the better bass if Alembic was not around?
« Reply #18 on: August 31, 2007, 05:58:27 PM »
I was a big Zon fan before I went exclusive playing Alembic, so Joe would get my vote.
 
A corollary question is what other basses would even exist if Alembic didn't.

pierreyves

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1346
    • www.vaucher-photos.ch
Re: What's the better bass if Alembic was not around?
« Reply #19 on: August 31, 2007, 06:29:09 PM »
You know Mayones basses from Poland ? I tried it last year in a swiss shop: light, great sound, easy to play, nice woods, very nice finition, correct price (about 3000$):
Mayones basses.
 
(Message edited by pierre-yves on August 31, 2007)

edmouk

  • club
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 56
Re: What's the better bass if Alembic was not around?
« Reply #20 on: September 01, 2007, 12:48:53 AM »
I have 2 Status (Series 2 and Empathy) and one Musicman Stingray which are excellent. They sound different from my Alembic Series I but they are great for both finger & slap playing (and my old back aprreciate too !).

darkstar01

  • Guest
Re: What's the better bass if Alembic was not around?
« Reply #21 on: September 01, 2007, 12:50:00 AM »
i like my '06 wilfer 7/8 and my 19th century czech flatback.... but i do miss ol' dark star :/
 
a

dannobasso

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2039
    • BLAK29
Re: What's the better bass if Alembic was not around?
« Reply #22 on: September 01, 2007, 05:46:18 AM »
I have a Stambaugh med. 4 but it has signature parts so that doesn't really count. My Ripper and Tbird have their place but not for any length of time. Hamer 12 is great fun but not as comfortable for a long period of time. I'm really impressed with the Dean Brian Bromberg 5. Well made,very easy on the hands and great electronics. But nothing really grabs me as much as my Alembics. Spend enough time with another product and its flaws present themselves. Hence my having basses available for sale all the time. Plus I have to pay down my latest Santa Rosa puppies. Though I do like the looks of the Lakland 5's (in black of course).

hendixclarke

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 877
Re: What's the better bass if Alembic was not around?
« Reply #23 on: September 01, 2007, 08:00:36 AM »
So far, I heard the Musicman Stingray multiple times (4 times) to be exact. It looks like The Stingray bass is second...
 
Oh my lord, I am not going to lie, Stingray is a bad mutha -shut your mouth... of second choice so far people.
 
However, it also gives us a perspective on basses I never had a chance to play. This post is very informative and as an Alembic player at heart, nothing has held my attention longer than my 1976 (before star wars and disco) series I.

lbpesq

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10708
Re: What's the better bass if Alembic was not around?
« Reply #24 on: September 01, 2007, 09:38:26 AM »
My favorite non-Alembic bass is my Billy Bass.  You press the button and it moves and sings Take Me To The River!
 
Bill, tgo

jacko

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4068
Re: What's the better bass if Alembic was not around?
« Reply #25 on: September 01, 2007, 09:44:23 AM »
Guitarists and bass players - two species separated by a common language ;-)
 
graeme

lbpesq

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10708
Re: What's the better bass if Alembic was not around?
« Reply #26 on: September 01, 2007, 12:33:19 PM »
Like an Alembic, it also needs batteries.  But it's MUCH lighter and fits in the overhead bin on every airplane!
 
Bill, tgo
 

hifiguy

  • club
  • Advanced Member
  • *
  • Posts: 462
Re: What's the better bass if Alembic was not around?
« Reply #27 on: September 01, 2007, 02:55:12 PM »
I'm with Alan, and would opt for hot-rodding my Tokai-made Vintage Series Jazz in the way he described.  It's still the best playing Jazz I've ever found, and I've owned half a dozen.

David Houck

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15645
Re: What's the better bass if Alembic was not around?
« Reply #28 on: September 02, 2007, 09:48:06 AM »
I keep clicking on the button, but I don't hear anything.

FC Bass

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2338
Re: What's the better bass if Alembic was not around?
« Reply #29 on: September 02, 2007, 09:56:59 AM »
Click here and look at 4:20

 
 
On topic:
I would most likely wind up with a Tama when Alembic wouldn't be around...
Damaged Justice, Dutch 'tallica tribute: Facebook, Youtube

'83 Spoiler
'88 Spoiler
'99 Orion 5 fretless
'10 Elan 5
'23 Series II Europa 5