Author Topic: Sweet '74 Series 1 Bass at Sweetwarter  (Read 311 times)


garyhead

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 669
  • Anything Worth Doing Is Worth Overdoing!
Re: Sweet '74 Series 1 Bass at Sweetwarter
« Reply #1 on: March 30, 2026, 03:39:12 PM »
It’s been up on Reverb for quite some time. 
781000 - GOLIATH Series I 4+8 Doubleneck (John Judge)
801662 - LEVIATHAN Series I 4+6 Doubleneck
94K8781  Essence 6
01OW12582  Orion 6 fretless (Rogue Electronics)
04SY13333  Spyder 4 V headstock (#25)
02SY12927  Spyder 8 (#02)
96CB9610  THE ORPHAN Classico Deluxe 6
F-1X, F-2B, SF-2, M1, M2 ELF

rv_bass

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4530
Re: Sweet '74 Series 1 Bass at Sweetwarter
« Reply #2 on: March 30, 2026, 04:57:45 PM »
I’ve been looking at that one for awhile.  Not sure if the Q switches are original, they look round instead of flat, and there is some routing around the battery cover.  Nice looking bass though :)

David Houck

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15840
Re: Sweet '74 Series 1 Bass at Sweetwarter
« Reply #3 on: March 31, 2026, 06:22:34 AM »
Maybe I'm imagining things, but the peghead looks crooked.  Look at the neck lams in the picture of the serial number compared to the crown point, and then other pics of the neck and peghead.  I could be wrong as I haven't had my second cup of coffee yet.

tkotmk42

  • club
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 197
Re: Sweet '74 Series 1 Bass at Sweetwarter
« Reply #4 on: March 31, 2026, 07:15:12 AM »
Maybe I'm imagining things, but the peghead looks crooked.  Look at the neck lams in the picture of the serial number compared to the crown point, and then other pics of the neck and peghead.  I could be wrong as I haven't had my second cup of coffee yet.

I saw that too, and was super puzzled.  I guess it could be possible if they didn't align the scarf jointed piece to the neck when they glued on.....

Very cool looking bass, and 2 digit serial number makes it super cool.  Just with it was short scale with small body :)

Takeo

mkazaria

  • club
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 108
Re: Sweet '74 Series 1 Bass at Sweetwarter
« Reply #5 on: March 31, 2026, 08:09:20 PM »
and there is some routing around the battery cover.

Good eye rv. I was also looking at this one but missed that detail.

keith_h

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3517
Re: Sweet '74 Series 1 Bass at Sweetwarter
« Reply #6 on: April 01, 2026, 05:15:42 AM »
The routing around the battery cover might have been to allow for easier installation of 9V batteries. As I recall the original batteries were specialized ones from the medical industry and were slightly smaller than your typical 9V battery. While you could work 9V in the cutout it was a tight fit. 

rv_bass

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4530
Re: Sweet '74 Series 1 Bass at Sweetwarter
« Reply #7 on: April 01, 2026, 06:35:42 AM »
Having owned and still own several older Alembics I can attest to the difficulty of installing and removing the 9v batteries.

Keith, can you expand on the medical batteries? Why were they chosen, what were the advantages, and why were they abandoned?

Thanks,
Rob

mica

  • alembic
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10681
Re: Sweet '74 Series 1 Bass at Sweetwarter
« Reply #8 on: April 01, 2026, 08:18:16 AM »
The original 9V batteries were not really specialized, they were just the batteries at the time, made with mercury and a little smaller than alkaline 9V batteries.

edwardofhuncote

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8415
Re: Sweet '74 Series 1 Bass at Sweetwarter
« Reply #9 on: Yesterday at 06:40:10 PM »
Maybe I'm imagining things, but the peghead looks crooked.  Look at the neck lams in the picture of the serial number compared to the crown point, and then other pics of the neck and peghead.  I could be wrong as I haven't had my second cup of coffee yet.

This is actually pretty funny... I don't think I've ever seen this, but I'm sure there must be at least a couple. The only thing I can think of to explain it is the glue joint slid sideways a couple degrees while under pressure at the time of original build. Adding to this, the D-string drill is a bit off, adding to the frontal asymmetry. Or possibly they just didn't catch the 'drift' until the moment the peghead template was placed. Putting myself in that spot... ruined neck blank or shift the headstock angle a couple degrees?


*looking at it from standoff, I think it's actually simpler. They laid the template on the new headstock 'paddle' crooked... lined the point at the end up with the wrong center. That would be easy to do, and once done, pretty much irreversible.


It's kind of endearing after all this time.
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 07:20:29 PM by edwardofhuncote »