Author Topic: What is that? (Look inside...)  (Read 555 times)

adriaan

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4318
What is that? (Look inside...)
« Reply #30 on: March 16, 2005, 07:22:00 AM »
Plus a maple neck and mahogany core, which is a strange combo for Warwicks. And then the maple pinstripes under the top and the back ...      
     
But how come they can't even manage to make the backplate flush with the surface?      
     
MSPR $5599.00 - that's a lot of money. So I wonder how much a ziricote top+back Exploiter-shaped Essence would cost -      
 
Quote  
 
- so that's an MSRP of 8900 USD. Well, okay that price includes 3300 for the ziricote (no idea why the back laminate is 300 USD more than the top laminate).    
     
And did you see the deluxe Warwick gigbag in the back-ground? So you spend 5599 on an awkwardly shaped bass and you stick it in a gigbag ...    
 
 
(Message edited by davehouck on March 16, 2005)

David Houck

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 15596
What is that? (Look inside...)
« Reply #31 on: March 16, 2005, 07:54:19 AM »
Adriaan, I hope you don't mind.  While the link you posted was itself quite descriptive, it was a bit wide, causing quite a bit of scrolling.  So I shortened it a little.

adriaan

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4318
What is that? (Look inside...)
« Reply #32 on: March 16, 2005, 08:04:10 AM »
Dave,
 
No problem. I tried to edit for the same reason, and saw the fake hyperlink with the whole URL, a comma and then the whole URL once more. In a regular hyperlink, the first item would be the display title, so I tried replacing that - but unfortunately it still came out showing the whole URL.
 
Not sure how you did it, but thanks!

adriaan

  • Global Moderator
  • Senior Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4318
What is that? (Look inside...)
« Reply #33 on: March 16, 2005, 08:14:06 AM »
Dave,  
 
Did I manage to ruin your URL? Aargh, I honestly wasn't trying to. Here's a shorter one:  
 
Quote
 
Addrian,
 
I couldn't get your shorter one to work; so I fixed my original edited version and replaced your shorter one with the edited version as well.  You didn't mess up my first one, I just made an error in formatting.  I hope that we haven't completely confused anyone who may have been trying to actually click on one of these links!
 
(Message edited by davehouck on March 16, 2005)