You can't believe everything you see on TV. The images are clearly very powerful, but so is the propaganda. So many of these documentary programs are made by people with an agenda who present opinions that they agree with as truth. I haven't seen this program yet, but your reaction makes me believe that maybe it had some purpose beyond a historical account of events.
There's no doubt that the local, state and federal governments could have responded more effectively, but this was a natural disaster. How much time and effort to you suppose went in to building a response plan for such an event and whose responsibility do you think it was to do so? How many times do you think they ran practice scenarios to test out the plan, and how likely would it have been that such a plan would have worked flawlessly when really enacted? Why weren't the state and local governments channeling funds to the improvement of the levees to handle a category five storm over the past 20 or 50 years instead of waiting for one to hit? I'm paying extra taxes to support a new sewer system for the town high school, so why wasn't New Orleans collecting them to address the levees before they failed?
I am neither supporting nor condemning the actions of any of the government bodies involved here. After all, that's pretty much a taboo topic on these boards. Let's not turn this into a massive political debate. Let's focus our energies on remembering those who were affected by these events, assisting them to recover as we can, and figuring out how to prevent a repeat performance.
Sorry, I guess this is just one of my hot buttons. While I don't agree with everything governments do, or have done in previous administrations, they aren't responsible for every bad thing that happens in the world. In the last week I have seen Michael Vick's situation and opposition to the NYC ban on metal bats in scholastic baseball blamed on the federal government. Personally, I am sick to death that they haven't enacted and enforced a ban on halitosis after all these years.
If there were no Iraq war, do you think planning for New Orleans to flood in a hurricane would have bubbled to the top of the funding/effort priority list? I could see it if the country had dozens of big cities around the coast built below sea level. Preventing and responding to such disasters would be a regular part of the culture. The technology for preventing them would be improved as would the experience in responding. It is both unfortunate and fortunate that New Orleans is unique. If this happens a second time, though, it will be unforgivable.
People have to be responsible for the choices they make and for their own livelihood. Maybe I will just go buy some beach front property. I'll build a walled compound just off shore, drain out the water and build my house there. When it floods in a storm, I can look forward to the government paying me a bunch of money to rebuild it and restart my life, right? Government aid is nothing more than forced charity on the part of every taxpayer. That's not necessarily a bad thing, but it is also often abused. If you feel strongly, I am sure you can find ways to donate your own time and money to the cause of repair and recovery. We did.