Hello Bob.
I agree with Bill and Jimmy, it comes down to a balance between functionality and aesthetics and these are both very personal. I have six or seven Alembics at this point (I’m not sure if I can count the one I purchased in December but haven’t seen yet). Several of these are Series basses, one a Europa, and a number of Signatures. Personally, I prefer the small bodied instruments over the larger standard points, the SC body shape over the Europa, and the custom 3/4 body shape I had built over all the others. For some reason, I just don’t like the Excel and Essence body shapes but I have absolutely no idea why. They just are not aesthetically pleasing to my personal tastes. But the necks on most of my basses are quite similar and that’s probably more important.
I seriously considered having a Darling bass made when I had my custom built but chickened out because it had yet to be done. As a short scale bass I think it would work and look very nice.
The aesthetic part of the equation you can solve by just looking at Alembic basses online. Be careful to not get thrown off when see something done in woods you are not considering, however, as I personally think most body shapes look better in some top lams than others.
The functionality part is really going to come down to your getting an Alembic into your hands and having a chance to play it. When you do, you will be amazed but also likely find that the body is only one piece of the equation with the neck probably being more important.