Author Topic: Neck Construction and width  (Read 2383 times)

sfnic

  • club
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 148
Neck Construction and width
« Reply #15 on: May 11, 2005, 06:18:51 PM »
Hmmm.  The bubinga and purpleheart combo for the front and back plates will be pretty reflective, which will definitely help the articulation in an 8-string.  
 
I'm assuming you're running something similar to the Alembic style neck construction and, since you're using it elsewhere, will be using purpleheart instead of ebony or walnut for the interior lams on the neck.  If that's true, you'll have a hair less solidity in the lows than you'd get with ebony.  The relatively short span you'd be adding with the bubinga and maple racing stripes shouldn't affect the neck resonance to any great degree, though.  (If you were using ebony, the bubinga and maple racing stripes might soften the bottom end a bit because of the extra mass in the last 1/4 wavelength.  With a PH neck, the extra mass should result in more of the same sound.)
 
Where the largest effect will be, of course, is in the lateral transmission between the neck core and the body wings.  There will be a few more glue joints in the path.  _That_ isn't much of an issue with a neck-through; especially in the Alembic style.  The single-truss model eliminates most of the body's effect on the sound, other than very minor top reflection back into the strings.  And, as mentioned above, that'll effect the upper octave half of the 8-string set more than the regular bass register.
 
So, no, it shouldn't be a detriment.  You'll affect things more by whether you chamber the wings or not, and by how much, if you do.  
 
How wide is your bubinga, anyway?  Gilmer Wood (gilmerwood.com) has some spectacular (I mean, mind-blowingly exhibition grade) quilted bubinga.  Very resonably priced, too.  You may want to look into saving what you have for a future project...

trekster

  • club
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 161
Neck Construction and width
« Reply #16 on: May 12, 2005, 05:26:29 AM »
Assumptions are basically correct.  A bit more detail:  the purpleheart interior lams for the neck are 1/8 instead of 1/4, with rock maple making up the rest.  The body is unchambered.  And I do have a place here locally that gets in figured bubinga up to the width of a freaking coffee table.. the bubinga I'm using for this is actually 5 wide wood I won off ebay and let dry in my shop for about 18 months before using.  It's already cut, shaped, and glued for the body parts.  My apologies if I came across as regretting my bubinga choice; I really don't feel like I'm stuck with them, since they are still beautiful.
 
--T

sfnic

  • club
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 148
Neck Construction and width
« Reply #17 on: May 13, 2005, 05:37:10 PM »
No problem.  1/8 lams will be a bit less stiff than 1/4, of course, but are quite usable (and a major improvement over a mere 3-piece maple neck, IMHO).
 
5 wings...yeah, I know the feeling.  My basic body design runs 13.5 wide, with 2.25 of that being the neck blank.  So my minimum stock width for wings ends up being 5.625.  6 even, if I want any room for slop or template location tweaks.  There're quite a few dealers on eBay that sell some really pretty stuff in 5 widths; a lot of them are turning blanks that could be resawn for several body sets.  Perfectly usable with the racing-stripe method you're setting up for.
 
nic

somatic

  • club
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 81
Neck Construction and width
« Reply #18 on: May 21, 2005, 03:40:03 AM »
Interesting thread. I thought that Alembic necks were made from a continuous piece of wood (including the headstock) even though I imagined it to be hellish expensive on wood.

trekster

  • club
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 161
Neck Construction and width
« Reply #19 on: May 23, 2005, 10:39:06 AM »
The only manufacturer that comes to mind for building with a one-piece neck is Rickenbacker, and that only for the 4004 series (I think the 4003 series is still 2-piece, but I could be wrong!).  They can get away with being that they have almost no angle on the headstock.  
 
--T

sfnic

  • club
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 148
Neck Construction and width
« Reply #20 on: May 23, 2005, 03:04:37 PM »
(Of course, most Fender bolt-ons and Gibson set-necks are 1-piece; we're talking about neck-through constructed instruments, here.)

bob

  • club
  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 808
Neck Construction and width
« Reply #21 on: May 23, 2005, 10:19:34 PM »
My Carvin has a one piece thru-neck with angled headstock. Best guess is that the angle is about 3 degrees less than my Alembic, but still ends up well beyond the extension of the body.