Author Topic: JACK PLAYING ALEMBIC #1- 5-2-75 (Read 192 times)

flaxattack · « **on:** May 06, 2004, 08:19:52 PM »

my minds eye's picture was better- still hunting through house for other photos that may still exist-this was taken at SUNY binghampton, NY
i tried to clean it up a bit but here you go.. i hope you like them,

flaxattack · « **Reply #1 on:** May 06, 2004, 08:26:45 PM »

edited...

flaxattack · « **Reply #2 on:** May 06, 2004, 08:29:13 PM »

if anyone wants to play with the original shot email me and i will fwd it

flaxattack · « **Reply #3 on:** May 06, 2004, 08:42:04 PM »

jerry- no beard- 1974 bottom line, ny
this was the unannounced shows at the now defunct 300 seat club- the first shows were posted on a 3x5 index card inside the door-luckily we were there the night before for doc watson- shows started at midnight- we got out at 5AM- by the third night? there were 1000 people trying to get in...

flaxattack · « **Reply #4 on:** May 06, 2004, 08:43:10 PM »

LOOK HOW YOUNG HE LOOKED...

(Message edited by flaxattack on May 06, 2004)

keavin · « **Reply #5 on:** May 07, 2004, 08:24:02 AM »

wow man!that is so cool,someone in this club has (#1),i'd love to see some good closeups,.looks like mine.as a matter of fact email me one of those shots i have the DELLphoto lab on my computer @ home. alembicroyalcrown@msn.com

bassman10096 · « **Reply #6 on:** May 07, 2004, 08:39:22 AM »

Brings back memories...

David Houck · « **Reply #7 on:** May 07, 2004, 09:18:00 AM »

Keavin; Jeff isn't saying that he has #1. Jeff is saying that he took a picture of Jack Casady playing #1 in 1975. Here are some more pictures if you haven't seen them already:
http://www3.alembic.com/img/hist_jack1.jpg
http://www.hottuna.com/photo_albums/1979/HT6_big.htm

keavin · « **Reply #8 on:** May 07, 2004, 09:33:41 AM »

yep ive seen those, what i was telling him is that one of the club members has #1, Val disclosed this on an previous thread,but that person wishes to remain anonomus.

David Houck · « **Reply #9 on:** May 07, 2004, 10:13:22 AM »

Sorry; I misread your post. Thanks for the clarification.