Picking up the converation from the woodbank, here's that #3766 with the Small Standard body shape outlined.

Once we start the build, I'll add updates here.

Here's how your work order 13964 reads as of now:
 
NECK
scale: 30.75
strings: 4
7-piece through body neck MAP|PH|MAP|EB|MAP|PH|MAP
fingerboard: ebony with abalone inlays 1.5x2.25 (like Stanley's)
side markers: Red LEDs with 2 amber each @ 12th and 24th
peghead: Crown, bevelled
 
BODY
Sandwich:
Coco Bolo top [wood to be selected]
Maple pinstripe
Purpleheart laminate
Maple pinstripe
Vermilion core, hollow
Maple pinstripe
Purpleheart laminate
Maple pinstripe
Coco Bolo Back
 
shape: Small Standard, no tummy or elbow carving
 
ROUTING:
pickups: 2 FatBoy
truss rod cover: 4R (standard for SC model)
backplates: brass
electronics: 2 volume, 2 filter, 2-3 position Q siwtches
 
FINISH:
polyester gloss with satin neck feel
 
SETUP:
logo: silver no script
hardware: gold plated
strap anchor: gold straplocks
strings: .045-.065-.080-.105
 
case: hardshell
 
Please review this list of features. Construction has not yet started, so make sure that any changes, additions, misunderstood instructions are sorted out quickly. Once the top wood is selected, Chip will start building right away.

Thanks Mica!  I really needed to see the body lines on there for an approximate scale.  While the photos had the inch lines there for scale, I just couldn't picture the scale of the body shape to apply it.
 
I appreciate that this position captures the eyes in the dark part of the wood, but how about something more like the photoshop hack I am putting in here?  I think the four little eyes in a row are cool, and I thought the best feature of this wood was the figuring in the light section near the top center.  I can be swayed either way, so I would appreciate any comments from others who may stop by the thread as well!
 
Thanks!
 
Here's the pic:
 

Hello Bob,
 
yes, we can position it that way too, no problem.
As soon as you decide which way you want to go we can begin construction.
 
Valentino

Mica/Valentino, this all looks great!  Thanks!
 
I think we're about there for the top wood, I'd just like to leave it open for a day or so in case anyone has an interesting comment.
 
Relative to the build order, there are a few things that I am not 100% comfortable with at this point:
 
1. We need to select a back wood.  I am leaning toward either 3767 or 3774.  I really like the light/dark/light stripes abutting the sap wood on 3767 and think that would work well with the colors of the PH and ebony in the neck.  This one probably is most similar to the top.  Otherwise, a reversal of the bookmatch on 3774 would provide for the body contour to approximately follow the rings and create that natural sunburst effect.  Anyone have an opinion?  I suspect that 3767 with a high placement on the board and cut at the very edge of the sap wood is the likely winner here as it will be the most organic combination with the top.
 
2. I'd like an extremely dark headstock laminate to really offset the gold H/W and silver logo, preferably something that looks symmetrical.  In particular, I'd be looking for blacks and reds with limited orange.  I think the orange would take away from the contrast/impact of the gold pegs.  
 
3. Also, on the headstock, what woods will the intermediate laminates be?  You ususally don't use cocobolo for this, right?  What do you think of an eb/map/ph/map/eb plywood to match the neck laminates (and body sandwich) to the bevel and provide that really dark face?  I'd still love a dark cocobolo face in place of the ebony there, but let me know what is feasible and what you think would work best.
 
4. The original spec had the neck pickup moved a bit toward the neck, though there isn't room to move it much.  I want to make sure I can get plenty of bottom out of this thing.  The 4R is still the full-sized truss rod cover, right?  I am open to guidance on this matter, particularly if the High Wizard has an opinion.
 
5. I believe that I confirmed this before, but the brass backplates are gold plated, correct?
 
6. I'd like to be careful about the position of the LED toggle relative to the jack.  I tend to use 90 degree cables and hook the lead between the strap and the bass as a strain relief, but it hangs free if I am playing seated.  I just want to make sure I don't toggle it by accident, or worse, break it.  The control layout from Randy's Custom Clarke Deluxe would be great, but I didn't spec in the side jack.  What do you recommend?
 
7. Also with the LEDs, there's a dimmer pot inside the control cavity?
 
Thanks again, I am so excited to get the production process underway!
 
-Bob

Oh, and one last thing...  
 
If there is any variation available in the neck laminates, I would like the non-maple lams to be at the thick end of the spectrum.  Is there one standard for these, or is there some poetic license from neck to neck?  The lams on my '90 Persuader seem fairly beefy at just about 1/4 each.
 
Also, they wouldn't all have to be the same thickness.  I think it would look really interesting if the ebony center lam were slightly thicker than the ones beside it.  I think an ideal would be something like 3/8 or 5/16 for the center ebony, 3/16 or 1/8 for the inner maples, and then 1/4 for the PH lams.  1/4 per lam will work just great, too, and I'm probably making this a bit too complicated.
 
If there's a standard, or if the customization here would be inconvenient or a burden, then I will just go with whatever works for you.

Hi Bob and friends,
 
When seeing this outline of the bass on the wood I wonder if it wouldn't be nice to leave the parallel lines concept of the topwood and go for putting the both pieces bookmatch to center in an angle, so the more chevron style, like this: >>>. You have to leave out a triangle part from the bottom-up. A triangle that could be recuperated in the peghead I guess??
Or in a box??? HA!
 
Paul the bad one

Hi Paul-
 
Thanks for the thoughts.  I played with that possibility myself because I really like the chevron affect.  The selected position isn't so much about parallel lines, it's more that there's just some really cool figuring in the center area near the top that I don't wish to give up.  Also, I couldn't get happy with the mix of dark and light and the way the instrument flowed with any of my attempts to lay out a chevron.
 
I would say, also, that I didn't spring for book-to-center.  I think this would be a tough wood choice for going to center in balancing the dark and light effects.  Also, the pickups and electronics would go over the nifty figuring.
 
Thanks for making me think about this!
 
The more I look at this, the more I am pleased by it.  I would just want to confirm my photoshop hack with another chalk outline whenever that would be convenient.  In particular, I'd be looking at the position of the dark section on the upper wing.
 
Still looking for thoughts on the back wood and the placement of pickups and controls, though!
 
Thanks, Paul!
 
-Bob

hi Bob.
Good to see you're finally getting your custom. Have you thought about turning the wood the other way up and swapping sides so the lighter angled figuring (coming down from the 3766 number) is going up the body. this would give a pretty cool chevron effect but would lose the figuring you like. In the end, It's your choice so take your time. My preference is for the swirly patterns. Good look with this one.
 
Graeme

Hi Graeme-
 
Yes, that is something I played with in Photoshop as well.  I do like the interesting grain pattern where it opens up above the dark areas, but the dark areas were still a part of the instrument on the upper wing, and I didn't think the way they ended up fitting in looked as organic.  If the board was cut to extend another six inches or so up above the cutoff point, it might have worked, but who knows what would have been going on in the wood up there?  I also wondered about the back side of these boards, but I've put these guys through enough hassles and the bookmatch of the wood is likely to be pretty different there.
 
I really like swirly patterns, too.  If I were to have my choice of all the wood ever listed, there are a couple selections from the sold pieces and one or two from the currently available Tribute boards that I really like.  On the other hand, since I am trying to build a poor man's version of the SC 30th anniversary bass here, I think this wood comes fairly close to capturing that feel.  I really expect this wood to become alive once finished.
 
Thanks for the thoughts!  
 
-Bob

Hi Bob; my first thought too was the chevron approach.  But it looks like you've thought that through.  Also, I was assuming you were bookmatching to center, and the chevron approach isn't as effective if not going to center.

Being a neurotic, I went back over the emails that I had sent over the past few months as well as the discussions pre-order.  There are four more items beyond what was already posted.
 
If we call the neck laminates width question #8, then:
 
9. Bridge block?  I thought it was specified as having one in the order but don't see that represented on your spec sheet.  I was asking for guidance on this item, so maybe someone decided I would be better off without it for the tone I am looking for?  
 
10. The crown headstock shape.  Originally, we were talking about a K-crown or a crown that was narrower at the bottom than the top.  The latter was a consideration to better adapt to the narrow nut width.  I think this detail got lost in the order spec, but let me know which crown variant you think will best fit with the rest of the design.
 
11. Neck dimensions.  You sepcified it as 1.5 x 2.25.  Is that actual nut width x bridge string spacing?  Just confirming here, I think that's what you're saying.  In the catalogs, the necks are specified by the nut and 24th fret widths, and I think that 2.25 at the 24th would be way too wide.  Could you confirm the actual measurements of the SC 30th bass?
 
12. Someone had said they were getting their straplocks mounted with bolts into inserts.  I asked about this as well since I have always had problems with straplock screws backing themselves out.  
 
Looking back to the earlier issues, I think 3767 will be it for the back wood if it is still available.  Can I ask for a pic of it with the body outline drawn in pushed toward the top of the wood and omitting most or all of the sapwood?  This would have to be slightly canted to follow the line of that light/dark/light stripe.  The stripe isn't perfectly straight, but I am looking to keep as little sapwood as possible without losing the integrity of the lines.  
 
Thanks again!

looks awesome- you got the flax neck!!! lol
>heres 2 cents
>go for the continous wood back plates
>it  imho looks so much better and you have so much invested already- pls  
>think about it,.,,,,its gonna be less than 400  
 
>compare it with some with brass  photos
>yes i know no one sees the back....
>but i am kinda weird-i  love the backs of alembics- maybe cause its just  
>more wood and less stuff
>ask them to show you the back woods
 
>oh and on the top wood photo
>i tend to lean to chips..
>reason
>all your controls can be slide down a little or will be inside the darker area by itself with none of or few of the lines being covered- also chips has more of a v shape
>did u play with moving it down?
>to right above the pinch in the center
>that might be good too
>tis goona be sweet whatever way