Alembic Guitars Club

Alembic products => Alembic Basses & Guitars => Topic started by: James Brown (jrbrown) on August 30, 2002, 05:04:27 AM

Title: Essence VS 3/4 Mark King
Post by: James Brown (jrbrown) on August 30, 2002, 05:04:27 AM

I currently own an Essence-4. I'm looking at getting a 3/4 body/head sized Mark King standard. Both basses share a lot of the same design features: 3 pc neck with walnut laminates, exoctic top with mahogany back, body size, etc.   Is it worth it to upgrade from an Essence to a 3/4 Mark King? Is there enough difference/improvements to justify the extra cash? If not, what bass would justify the upgrade? Perhaps a Stanley Clarke?  
(http://club.alembicguitars.com/Images/393/1639.jpg)
 
(http://club.alembicguitars.com/Images/393/1640.jpg)

Title: Essence VS 3/4 Mark King
Post by: Jonathan Johnstone (stoney) on August 30, 2002, 05:20:44 AM

Hi James,
Guess this is purely a matter of taste.  I own an Essence but had it custom made with the Signature Electronics (like the MK & SC) I really got used to the Essence shape because I bought one off the rack then decided to step up the electronics.  I did the same with my Spoiler ('94) I had Alembic put in the Signature electronics and side LED's.  After getting my Essence the I came to the conclusion that the Spoiler body was too bulky for me (which is why it's for sale**see swap page ;^)  Anyway, your Essence is a beautiful instrument but there's no doubt that the electronics in the MK are much higher end and will give you more versitility.